To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Gaza: World Food Programme
Tuesday 16th April 2024

Asked by: Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the World Food Programme's ability to scale up its humanitarian operation in Gaza.

Answered by Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon - Minister of State (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

We continue to support the United Nations World Food Programme (WFP).

On 20 March, the Foreign Secretary announced that the UK has funded WFP to provide 2,000 tons of food aid, enough to feed 275,000 people in Gaza. This is our largest delivery of aid to Gaza during the current crisis.

We remain committed to getting humanitarian aid to the people in Gaza who desperately need it, including through UN agencies and British charities.


Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 15 Apr 2024
Litigation Funding Agreements (Enforceability) Bill [HL]

Speech Link

View all Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Litigation Funding Agreements (Enforceability) Bill [HL]

Written Question
Nimrod Aircraft: Accidents
Monday 18th March 2024

Asked by: Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by The Earl of Minto on 27 November 2023 (HL200), what assessment they have made of the accuracy of report of the Board of Inquiry into the Nimrod crash on 2 September 1995, taking into consideration the rules pertaining to such boards of inquiry at that time, and its finding that Flight Lieutenant Dominic Gilbert was to blame for the crash.

Answered by Earl of Minto - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence)

It is not possible to re-consider aspects of Boards of Inquiry held in the past without full reinvestigation of the original incident. It would not be in the public interest to re-open any such inquiries, where it is deemed there are no lessons to be identified for the Service, such as when aircraft are no longer in service. The likely complexity of such work due to the passage of time and the need to re-allocate Departmental resources are also significant considerations.

In 1997 Defence Ministers directed that BOI should not be permitted to attribute blame or negligence in cases of unnatural death or serious injury. Subsequently, in 2008, Boards of Inquiry were replaced by Service Inquiries under the Armed Forces Act 2006, separating accident investigation from the operational chain of command.

Service Inquiries (SI) are not permitted to find negligence or apportion blame, in order to encourage an open reporting culture, and to ensure that full and frank evidence be provided to SI panels.


Speech in Lords Chamber - Thu 14 Mar 2024
Post Office Legislation

Speech Link

View all Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Post Office Legislation

Division Vote (Lords)
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 180 Conservative No votes vs 4 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 193
Division Vote (Lords)
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 178 Conservative No votes vs 3 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 192
Division Vote (Lords)
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 178 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 199
Division Vote (Lords)
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 180 Conservative No votes vs 5 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 192
Division Vote (Lords)
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 175 Conservative No votes vs 4 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 187
Speech in Lords Chamber - Thu 07 Mar 2024
Defence Acquisition Reform

Speech Link

View all Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Defence Acquisition Reform