Division Vote (Commons)
20 Feb 2024 - Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting) -
View Vote Context
Jack Brereton (Con) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
10 Conservative No votes vs
0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 7 Noes - 10
Division Vote (Commons)
20 Feb 2024 - Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting) -
View Vote Context
Jack Brereton (Con) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
10 Conservative No votes vs
0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 7 Noes - 10
Division Vote (Commons)
20 Feb 2024 - Offshore Petroleum Licensing Bill -
View Vote Context
Jack Brereton (Con) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
276 Conservative Aye votes vs
0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 221
Division Vote (Commons)
20 Feb 2024 - Trade (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting) -
View Vote Context
Jack Brereton (Con) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
10 Conservative No votes vs
0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 7 Noes - 10
Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 20 Feb 2024
Immigration Rules and Border Security
Speech Link
View all Jack Brereton (Con - Stoke-on-Trent South) contributions to the debate on: Immigration Rules and Border Security
Speech in Commons Chamber - Mon 19 Feb 2024
Oral Answers to Questions
Speech Link
View all Jack Brereton (Con - Stoke-on-Trent South) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions
Speech in Commons Chamber - Mon 19 Feb 2024
Oral Answers to Questions
Speech Link
View all Jack Brereton (Con - Stoke-on-Trent South) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions
Written Question
Wednesday 7th February 2024
Asked by:
Jack Brereton (Conservative - Stoke-on-Trent South)
Question
to the Department for Transport:
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what information his Department holds on (a) whether any issues were identified during the testing of new Hitachi AT300 rolling stock to replace Voyager on Avanti West Coast services, (b) whether an assessment has been made of the potential effect of the lack of tilt mechanism for those trains on (i) maintaining safe operation around bends at speed, (ii) journey times and (iii) rail timetables and (c) for what reason the tender for the rolling stock replacement for Voyager on Avanti West Coast services did not specify the inclusion of a tilt mechanism.
Answered by Huw Merriman
- Minister of State (Department for Transport)
The procurement, safety risk assessment, and safe operation of the Hitachi AT300 rolling stock is the responsibility of the operator. When running rolling stock procurements, operators take account of factors such as what products are available to the market, reliability, operating cost, passenger capacity, comfort and environmental performance. Network Rail is currently upgrading infrastructure on parts of the West Coast Main Line to allow higher speed running with non-tilting trains. The Office of Rail and Road is responsible for ensuring the new trains meet rail safety regulatory requirements before they can operate on the mainline.
The Department is looking forward to the introduction of Avanti West Coast's brand new Hitachi rolling stock later this year which will replace its current diesel fleet in line with the Department's goal to run a more sustainable railway, resulting in a 61 per cent cut in carbon emissions, as well as offering more space and a quieter journey for passengers.
Division Vote (Commons)
31 Jan 2024 - Business without Debate -
View Vote Context
Jack Brereton (Con) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
265 Conservative Aye votes vs
0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 185
Division Vote (Commons)
31 Jan 2024 - Political Parties, Elections and Referendums -
View Vote Context
Jack Brereton (Con) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
270 Conservative Aye votes vs
0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 190