All 3 Debates between Neil Coyle and Lord Johnson of Marylebone

Tue 23rd Jan 2018
Space Industry Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)
Public Bill Committees

Committee Debate: 1st sitting: House of Commons
Tue 23rd Jan 2018
Space Industry Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)
Public Bill Committees

Committee Debate: 2nd sitting: House of Commons

Space Industry Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

Debate between Neil Coyle and Lord Johnson of Marylebone
Committee Debate: 1st sitting: House of Commons
Tuesday 23rd January 2018

(6 years, 2 months ago)

Public Bill Committees
Read Full debate Space Industry Act 2018 View all Space Industry Act 2018 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: Public Bill Committee Amendments as at 23 January 2018 - (23 Jan 2018)
Lord Johnson of Marylebone Portrait Joseph Johnson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman will be interested to know that we will be introducing draft legislation. Should he detect any shortcoming in its application and should he continue to have concerns about whether the spaceport and spaceflight activity enabled by the Bill would have risks posed to it by drone activity, there will be plenty of opportunities in the development of that legislation for Members to point that out to Government.

Neil Coyle Portrait Neil Coyle (Bermondsey and Old Southwark) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

When will the draft legislation come forward? Given that the police have indicated they do not have the resources to investigate crimes such as shop lifting, bike thefts and mobile phone thefts, will it include resources to ensure that the police can adequately deliver those new responsibilities?

Lord Johnson of Marylebone Portrait Joseph Johnson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Sorry, I did not catch the last bit of what you said.

Space Industry Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

Debate between Neil Coyle and Lord Johnson of Marylebone
Committee Debate: 2nd sitting: House of Commons
Tuesday 23rd January 2018

(6 years, 2 months ago)

Public Bill Committees
Read Full debate Space Industry Act 2018 View all Space Industry Act 2018 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: Public Bill Committee Amendments as at 23 January 2018 - (23 Jan 2018)
Lord Johnson of Marylebone Portrait Joseph Johnson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The European Space Agency delivers a number of programmes for the European Union, but we continue to be a member of the ESA in our own right and, as I said, we are contributing record amounts—more than €1.4 billion in the current budget period.

Neil Coyle Portrait Neil Coyle (Bermondsey and Old Southwark) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

For absolute clarity, is the Minister suggesting that payments via the EU could still be possible, in contrast with the Foreign Secretary’s position on that matter?

Lord Johnson of Marylebone Portrait Joseph Johnson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am not going to parse comments by others that I have not seen, but I can confirm that we remain a full member of the European Space Agency in our own right, we are contributing record amounts to its budget, and we have every expectation of continuing to be a full member of that organisation long into the future.

On the new clause’s requirement to undertake an assessment, the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union provided the relevant Committees with reports for many sectors, including one for the UK space sector, on 27 November. As the hon. Member for Central Ayrshire said, that report contained a description of the sector, the current EU regulatory regime, existing frameworks for the facilitation of trade between countries in the sector, and sector views.

Student Maintenance Grants

Debate between Neil Coyle and Lord Johnson of Marylebone
Tuesday 19th January 2016

(8 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Johnson of Marylebone Portrait Joseph Johnson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman can tell his constituents that university and going into higher education remain transformational experiences, especially for people from disadvantaged backgrounds. They are likely on average to go on to earn £100,000 more over their lifetimes as a result. Owing to the instrument that we are debating today, they will have access to more financial support while they are at university than ever before.

Let us acknowledge the success of these reforms. As a consequence, we today have a higher education system with record numbers going to university, record numbers of disadvantaged students, the highest ever rates of black and minority ethnic participation, and more women in higher education than ever before. The principles underpinning these reforms flow from a clear manifesto commitment to

“control spending, eliminate the deficit, and start to run a surplus.”

I have already referred to the other commitments in the manifesto, on page 35, relating specifically to higher education funding.

Those Opposition Members who oppose our policy and want to reintroduce more direct taxpayer support must think about whether they would also have to reintroduce the student number controls we abolished and prevent thousands of young people from attending university.

Lord Johnson of Marylebone Portrait Joseph Johnson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does the hon. Gentleman wish to reintroduce student number controls?

Neil Coyle Portrait Neil Coyle
- Hansard - -

The point I want to make is that applications to the most selective universities from students from the lowest income households has fallen since 2010, from 16.2% in 2010 to 15.3% in 2014. What impact, in terms of the number dropping further, will this policy have?

Lord Johnson of Marylebone Portrait Joseph Johnson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We want people from disadvantaged backgrounds to go to the very best universities in this country in as high a proportion as possible. We want to see that increase, which is why we asked in our guidance letters to the director of the Office for Fair Access that he pay particular attention to institutions that are not pulling their weight in getting people in from disadvantaged backgrounds. We will continue that in our next letter to the director of the OFA.