Debates between Alister Jack and Scott Benton during the 2019 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Alister Jack and Scott Benton
Wednesday 29th March 2023

(1 year ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Alister Jack Portrait Mr Jack
- Parliament Live - Hansard - -

Indeed. As we have seen with freeports, as we will see with investment zones and as we have seen with city and region growth deals, when we work together, we are truly better together.

Scott Benton Portrait Scott Benton
- Parliament Live - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does my right hon. Friend agree that by extending our cost of living support and taking measures to deliver long-term sustainable growth while reducing inflation, the Chancellor’s Budget strengthened the Union by delivering for all parts of it?

Alister Jack Portrait Mr Jack
- Parliament Live - Hansard - -

Yes. The cost of living support package has been a total of £94 billion, an average of £3,300 for every household in the United Kingdom.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Alister Jack and Scott Benton
Wednesday 15th December 2021

(2 years, 4 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Alister Jack Portrait Mr Jack
- Hansard - -

I have discussed this matter with Sir Ian Wood, and I do not think the hon. Gentleman reflects his views fairly. Sir Ian Wood understands and agrees with us that the bid can be improved. To be clear, the difference between Acorn and Humberside, Teesside and Merseyside, was that Humberside, Teesside and Merseyside have a huge hinterland of industrial carbon. Acorn was bringing the carbon from all parts of the UK and/or Europe to make the bid work. We are working on how to get more industrial carbon into the project, to make it more viable and to expedite it for 2023.

Scott Benton Portrait Scott Benton (Blackpool South) (Con)
- Parliament Live - Hansard - - - Excerpts

6. What discussions he has had with Cabinet colleagues on the implications for Scotland of plans to restructure the British Army.

Tom Randall Portrait Tom Randall (Gedling) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

13. What discussions he has had with Cabinet colleagues on the implications for Scotland of plans to restructure the British Army.

Alister Jack Portrait The Secretary of State for Scotland (Mr Alister Jack)
- Parliament Live - Hansard - -

My office and I have regular discussions with the Ministry of Defence on all matters relating to defence in Scotland, including the latest plans to modernise and restructure the Army. I was pleased that the review included plans for the Army to expand its footprint in Scotland; it is going from six to seven units, and Scotland will have a greater proportion of the Army than today.

While I have the opportunity, I would also like to thank our fantastic British armed forces who are currently supporting the booster programme in Scotland. The Secretary of State for Defence announced yesterday that a further 100 military personnel will support the vital booster campaign, and today the MOD has announced that another 80 medics are going to three NHS boards in Scotland. That means that over 400 military personnel are supporting Scotland’s health services.

Scott Benton Portrait Scott Benton
- Parliament Live - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does the Secretary of State agree that the “Future Soldier” paper shows just how important defence is to Scotland and Scotland is to the defence of the UK and our allies, and does he share my enthusiasm that it delivers £355 million-worth of investment in the Army estate in Scotland?

Alister Jack Portrait Mr Jack
- Parliament Live - Hansard - -

Absolutely. Scotland plays a vital role in the defence of the UK. The Army’s future soldier restructuring programme is great news for Scotland. Not only will it deliver £355 million of investment in the Army’s Scottish estate, as my hon. Friend pointed out, but Scotland will gain a major unit and, as I said, we will see a greater proportion of the British Army in Scotland.