Information between 11th March 2024 - 10th April 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 106 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 193 |
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 105 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 192 |
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 106 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 199 |
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 105 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 192 |
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 105 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 187 |
13 Mar 2024 - West Midlands Combined Authority (Transfer of Police and Crime Commissioner Functions) Order 2024 - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 84 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 137 Noes - 54 |
13 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 96 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 154 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 129 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 263 Noes - 233 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 125 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 209 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 226 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 129 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 230 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 128 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 228 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 124 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 251 Noes - 214 |
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 249 Noes - 219 |
Speeches |
---|
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent speeches from: LGBT Veterans: Financial Redress
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent contributed 1 speech (151 words) Thursday 21st March 2024 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Defence |
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent speeches from: 809 Naval Air Squadron
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent contributed 1 speech (84 words) Monday 11th March 2024 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Defence |
Written Answers |
---|
Armed Forces: Gender
Asked by: Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 13th March 2024 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government what was the gender breakdown of people leaving the Armed Forces in each year from 2010 to 2023. Answered by Earl of Minto - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The information requested by the noble Lady can be found on the attached excel spreadsheet. |
Defence Business Services: Staff
Asked by: Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 13th March 2024 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government how many sexual harassment specialists are employed in Defence Business Services. Answered by Earl of Minto - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) 43 HR caseworkers are employed in Defence Business Services, who advise on HR processes including claims received for sexual harassment cases. |
Ministry of Defence: Gender
Asked by: Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 13th March 2024 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government what is the gender breakdown of (1) people currently employed by the Ministry of Defence and associated agencies, and (2) civil servants employed by the Ministry of Defence, by grade. Answered by Earl of Minto - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The information requested by the noble Lady can be found on the attached excel spreadsheet. |
Vetting
Asked by: Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour - Life peer) Monday 18th March 2024 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what is the average wait time for each of the eight levels of security vetting by United Kingdom Security Vetting, from 'Baseline Personnel Security Standard' to 'Enhanced Developed Vetting'. Answered by Baroness Neville-Rolfe - Minister of State (Cabinet Office) As Minister for State at the Cabinet Office I am able to provide a response in relation to National Security Vetting (NSV). UKSV acts as the service provider for NSV across His Majesty’s Government (HMG). NSV remains a separate and distinct process to recruitment and onboarding processes and provides an additional personnel assurance within both public and private sector for roles and projects that require access to the sensitive assets and Protectively Marked Materials (PMM). The government does not comment on the workings of the NSV process at the strategic or tactical level for security reasons and thereby details of numbers awaiting NSV cannot be shared. However the following information may be useful. The Baseline Personnel Security Standard (BPSS) is not a level of NSV, nor conducted by United Kingdom Security Vetting (UKSV); it is a separate pre-employment check conducted locally by recruiting departments. As this is a localised departmental element, no central record of data for BPSS is held within HMG at this time. Following a stabilisation programme initiated in 2023, there have been sustained and stable improvements in performance against Key Performance Indicators (KPI) across all service levels of National Security Vetting clearances which includes Counter Terrorist Check (CTC), Security Check (SC) and Developed Vetting (DV). Across core services:
The requirements for security cleared roles across HMG vary and are set by individual department and partner agencies dependent on duties and level of access to Protectively Marked Materials (PMM). It is, therefore, not possible to provide confirmation of the performance of NSV in relation to specific roles. In line with the practice followed by successive administrations, the Government does not otherwise comment on security matters, including average actual processing times. |
Private Sector: Vetting
Asked by: Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour - Life peer) Monday 18th March 2024 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government how many people employed by the private sector are currently awaiting security vetting by United Kingdom Security Vetting. Answered by Baroness Neville-Rolfe - Minister of State (Cabinet Office) As Minister for State at the Cabinet Office I am able to provide a response in relation to National Security Vetting (NSV). UKSV acts as the service provider for NSV across His Majesty’s Government (HMG). NSV remains a separate and distinct process to recruitment and onboarding processes and provides an additional personnel assurance within both public and private sector for roles and projects that require access to the sensitive assets and Protectively Marked Materials (PMM). The government does not comment on the workings of the NSV process at the strategic or tactical level for security reasons and thereby details of numbers awaiting NSV cannot be shared. However the following information may be useful. The Baseline Personnel Security Standard (BPSS) is not a level of NSV, nor conducted by United Kingdom Security Vetting (UKSV); it is a separate pre-employment check conducted locally by recruiting departments. As this is a localised departmental element, no central record of data for BPSS is held within HMG at this time. Following a stabilisation programme initiated in 2023, there have been sustained and stable improvements in performance against Key Performance Indicators (KPI) across all service levels of National Security Vetting clearances which includes Counter Terrorist Check (CTC), Security Check (SC) and Developed Vetting (DV). Across core services:
The requirements for security cleared roles across HMG vary and are set by individual department and partner agencies dependent on duties and level of access to Protectively Marked Materials (PMM). It is, therefore, not possible to provide confirmation of the performance of NSV in relation to specific roles. In line with the practice followed by successive administrations, the Government does not otherwise comment on security matters, including average actual processing times. |
Vetting
Asked by: Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour - Life peer) Monday 18th March 2024 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government how many people are currently awaiting security vetting by United Kingdom Security Vetting. Answered by Baroness Neville-Rolfe - Minister of State (Cabinet Office) As Minister for State at the Cabinet Office I am able to provide a response in relation to National Security Vetting (NSV). UKSV acts as the service provider for NSV across His Majesty’s Government (HMG). NSV remains a separate and distinct process to recruitment and onboarding processes and provides an additional personnel assurance within both public and private sector for roles and projects that require access to the sensitive assets and Protectively Marked Materials (PMM). The government does not comment on the workings of the NSV process at the strategic or tactical level for security reasons and thereby details of numbers awaiting NSV cannot be shared. However the following information may be useful. The Baseline Personnel Security Standard (BPSS) is not a level of NSV, nor conducted by United Kingdom Security Vetting (UKSV); it is a separate pre-employment check conducted locally by recruiting departments. As this is a localised departmental element, no central record of data for BPSS is held within HMG at this time. Following a stabilisation programme initiated in 2023, there have been sustained and stable improvements in performance against Key Performance Indicators (KPI) across all service levels of National Security Vetting clearances which includes Counter Terrorist Check (CTC), Security Check (SC) and Developed Vetting (DV). Across core services:
The requirements for security cleared roles across HMG vary and are set by individual department and partner agencies dependent on duties and level of access to Protectively Marked Materials (PMM). It is, therefore, not possible to provide confirmation of the performance of NSV in relation to specific roles. In line with the practice followed by successive administrations, the Government does not otherwise comment on security matters, including average actual processing times. |