All 2 Debates between Jeremy Lefroy and Eleanor Laing

Wed 4th Sep 2019
European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 6) Bill
Commons Chamber

3rd reading: House of Commons & Committee: 1st sitting: House of Commons

European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 6) Bill

Debate between Jeremy Lefroy and Eleanor Laing
3rd reading: House of Commons & Committee: 1st sitting: House of Commons
Wednesday 4th September 2019

(4 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019 View all European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: Committee of the whole House Amendments as at 4 September 2019 - (4 Sep 2019)
Jeremy Lefroy Portrait Jeremy Lefroy (Stafford) (Con)
- Hansard - -

On a point of order, Dame Eleanor. Is it in order for my hon. Friend the Member for Christchurch (Sir Christopher Chope), for whom I have great respect, to compare what we are talking about now with slavery, which, around the world, is a most terrible thing and—

Eleanor Laing Portrait The First Deputy Chairman of Ways and Means (Dame Eleanor Laing)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Order. I appreciate the point the hon. Gentleman is making, and indeed his dedication to fighting that particular evil, but that is a debating point, not a point of order, and we do not have time this afternoon.

Business of the House

Debate between Jeremy Lefroy and Eleanor Laing
Thursday 27th June 2019

(4 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Eleanor Laing Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Dame Eleanor Laing)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We welcome the pupils of Hillington Primary School to our proceedings this morning. I hope that they think the Chamber this morning has been as well-behaved as they have.

Jeremy Lefroy Portrait Jeremy Lefroy (Stafford) (Con)
- Hansard - -

If my right hon. Friend would like to visit the beautiful constituency of Stafford, he will see that we are contributing greatly to house building in the UK, with a rate more than double the national average. However, developers are taking advantage of rules about councils falling very briefly below the five-year land supply to put in developments that are unwanted by local residents and environmentally unsound, particularly in the village of Penkridge. May we have a debate on the way in which developers are taking advantage of loopholes in planning legislation, and on how we should abide by the plans that have been put in place by our councils, in consultation with residents, and not see these unwanted, unplanned-for housing developments springing up simply because the developer wants to put them there?