All 1 Mike Wood contributions to the Criminal Finances Act 2017

Read Bill Ministerial Extracts

Tue 15th Nov 2016
Criminal Finances Bill (First sitting)
Public Bill Committees

Committee Debate: 1st sitting: House of Commons

Criminal Finances Bill (First sitting) Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Home Office

Criminal Finances Bill (First sitting)

Mike Wood Excerpts
Committee Debate: 1st sitting: House of Commons
Tuesday 15th November 2016

(7 years, 6 months ago)

Public Bill Committees
Read Full debate Criminal Finances Act 2017 Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: Public Bill Committee Amendments as at 15 November 2016 - (15 Nov 2016)
None Portrait The Chair
- Hansard -

Thank you. May I point out that we have got 30 minutes left, and eight other Members of Parliament want to ask questions? I remind both witnesses and Members that it is your time, and that witnesses are here today to answer as many questions as possible.

Mike Wood Portrait Mike Wood (Dudley South) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Q This question is directed in particular to Mr Thompson. Could you tell us more about the challenges faced by the Serious Fraud Office in investigating a suspected criminal financial activity, and how the specific measures in the Bill will help you to do that more effectively? In particular, I would like to know more about how unexplained wealth orders might be expected to help in pursuing foreign officials suspected of grand corruption.

Mark Thompson: Members of the SFO and I have been involved in consulting with the Home Office as this process has developed. Unexplained wealth orders provide an avenue for us to start civil recovery investigations effectively in a way that we cannot do at a moment. Where information is held abroad, or is in jurisdictions where co-operation is unlikely, this tool provides us with a way of kicking the process off and taking action against property in the UK that we suspect to be derived from crime. As things currently stand, the thresholds for pursuing civil recovery are, in many cases, high enough to make this difficult. That is how I would see our using the legislation in the first instance.

Nic Dakin Portrait Nic Dakin
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Q The new corporate offence relates only to tax evasion, which makes sense. But is there a case for extending it to dissuade companies from facilitating quite aggressive tax avoidance?

Simon York: At the moment this is a criminal offence, and tax avoidance is not a crime, which is why that would be difficult. We are currently consulting on additional legislation that would penalise the enablers of tax avoidance, so we are seeking legislation in that area too.