All 3 Debates between Peter Bone and Helen Goodman

Nomination of Members to Committees

Debate between Peter Bone and Helen Goodman
Tuesday 12th September 2017

(7 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Peter Bone Portrait Mr Bone
- Hansard - -

Certainly. Of course.

As I understand it, the Opposition are saying that when a Bill goes into Committee, the Members on the Committee always vote in the way the party Whips tell them to. That is just not the case. I have seen Government Members in Bill Committees who are absolutely opposed to something the Government are proposing because it is not right. That is what the Committee system is about. It is about improving Bills. I am reluctant to say that I agree with my right hon. Friend the Member for West Dorset (Sir Oliver Letwin) on this issue, but he is quite correct. The check and balance is the Report stage. If, as the Opposition claim, they have the majority in this House, they will be able to reverse anything that is passed in Committee.

Helen Goodman Portrait Helen Goodman
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Peter Bone Portrait Mr Bone
- Hansard - -

No. I am taking a leaf out of the shadow Leader of the House’s book.

European Union (Withdrawal) Bill

Debate between Peter Bone and Helen Goodman
2nd reading: House of Commons
Monday 11th September 2017

(7 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 View all European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Peter Bone Portrait Mr Bone
- Hansard - -

I entirely accept that point about the negative procedure. I want to move on to—

Helen Goodman Portrait Helen Goodman (Bishop Auckland) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Peter Bone Portrait Mr Bone
- Hansard - -

I do not have time to take any more interventions. I must press on. There are so many—

Peter Bone Portrait Mr Bone
- Hansard - -

No!

Basically, this Bill is about the principle of ending EU control over this House and incorporating those laws. That is fine, and that is why every Member of the House should vote for it tonight. What they should then do is look in Committee, clause by clause, at how we are proposing to scrutinise, change and incorporate laws. I wholly accept that the negative SI procedure is probably not the best way of proceeding.

Another thing that has been mentioned—the right hon. Member for Derby South brought it up, and it is probably what I wanted to talk about most—is programme motions. As a principle, I am against programme motions. I accept entirely the answer she gave me, which is that it was a lot worse before. However, she did not go on to say that it is great now, and I do not think it has been. There have been a lot of problems with the Government deciding programming and the timing of scrutiny.

Now, this particular programme motion is one of the better ones, because the debate is eight days long, with eight hours’ protected time each day. I am fed up of sitting here waiting for a debate, only to find that there is statement after statement, which reduces the time we have for that debate. Thankfully, we are not doing that this time, and if there is a need for extra time, the Leader of the House would be well advised to grant it.

I was here at business questions on Thursday, and the shadow Leader of the House did not complain about the timetabling. [Interruption.] Well, I must have been deaf, because I was listening out for it. She moaned about a lot of things, but she did not complain about the length of time.

Serious Crime Bill [Lords]

Debate between Peter Bone and Helen Goodman
Monday 23rd February 2015

(9 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Helen Goodman Portrait Helen Goodman (Bishop Auckland) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Further to that point of order, Mr Speaker.

Peter Bone Portrait Mr Bone
- Hansard - -

rose—