Withdrawal Agreement: Legal Opinion Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Attorney General
1st reading: House of Commons
Tuesday 12th March 2019

(5 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Immigration (Armed Forces) Bill 2017-19 View all Immigration (Armed Forces) Bill 2017-19 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Geoffrey Cox Portrait The Attorney General
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am not convinced that I fully understood the question, perhaps because I did it too much justice and thought it might be a sensible one. The truth is that I doubt I agree with it.

Robert Courts Portrait Robert Courts (Witney) (Con)
- Hansard - -

May I place on the record at the outset that, whatever one may think of the issues at stake, the integrity and honesty of the Attorney General are absolutely above question? I commend him for his approach. Much of this agreement requires consideration of the concept of bad faith, so will he please outline what circumstances would constitute bad faith and how the UK might prove them, bearing in mind that, as he will know, international arbitrators are loth to find that a sovereign state such as the UK or a respected body such as the EU have acted in bad faith? Is it not the case that, were the EU to continue to propose ideas that were in good faith but unacceptable to the UK, such as a customs union, these proposals would not assist us?