Debates between Sarah Jones and Beth Winter during the 2019-2024 Parliament

Mon 25th Apr 2022
Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill
Commons Chamber

Consideration of Lords messageConsideration of Lords Message & Consideration of Lords message

Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill

Debate between Sarah Jones and Beth Winter
Sarah Jones Portrait Sarah Jones
- Hansard - -

My inbox—I do not know about the Minister’s—is full of emails asking us to vote against the Government’s provisions today. I have not had a single one asking me to vote in favour.

Beth Winter Portrait Beth Winter (Cynon Valley) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I may be able to enlighten the Minister as to why there is no need for the provisions on noise. The Minister for Social Justice in Wales, Jane Hutt, has been quoted as saying that the current legal framework already provides sufficient scope, and that

“this means there is no requirement or need to include a new, far more draconian measure”.

We have sufficient laws in place, and there is no need for these provisions. The Bill rides roughshod over the devolution settlement.

Sarah Jones Portrait Sarah Jones
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend is right. I am proud to have campaigned with Jane Hutt. She knows what she is talking about, and she delivers results—something that this Government could learn from.

Recently published guidance on this bizarre change to the law gives us the helpful tip that

“a noisy protest outside an office with double glazing may not meet the threshold”

in the Bill. The guidance is seriously asking the police to base their consideration of whether a protest is too noisy on how many buildings around it have double-glazed windows. How on earth will the police know? Is it fair to our police if the law is so peculiar that they could interpret it in a million different ways, and would stand accused of bias whatever they did? I urge Ministers to bear in mind the consequences of these provisions on the police officers trying to put them into practice.