Draft Postal Packets (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2023

Debate between Victoria Atkins and James Duddridge
Monday 17th July 2023

(1 year, 3 months ago)

General Committees
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Victoria Atkins Portrait The Financial Secretary to the Treasury (Victoria Atkins)
- Hansard - -

I beg to move,

That the Committee has considered the draft Postal Packets (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2023.

May I say what a pleasure it is to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Pritchard? May I also thank hon. Members, including right hon. and hon. Friends, for coming to this Committee today? I hope that they are able to hear me. I thank them for coming to this Committee. I do understand the sensitivities—

James Duddridge Portrait Sir James Duddridge
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

On a point of order, Mr Pritchard.

Victoria Atkins Portrait Victoria Atkins
- Hansard - -

I am just moving the motion—

James Duddridge Portrait Sir James Duddridge
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

No, I am asking Mr Pritchard to take a point of order. I am not asking to intervene on the Minister; I am making a point of order.

--- Later in debate ---
Victoria Atkins Portrait Victoria Atkins
- Hansard - -

I am really pleased that my hon. Friend has brought that up, because it touches on the timing point that colleagues have raised. Understandably, colleagues have asked, “Why is this happening now? Why can’t it wait until October next year?” Of course, the Windsor framework arrangements will come into force in October next year, but there is a limited range of prohibited or restricted goods that are supposed to comply with EU customs rules today—for example, hazardous chemicals and chemicals that can deplete the ozone, and blood diamonds have also been mentioned to me. We do not have those powers at the moment, so we need to fill the gap as quickly as we can, so that in respect of those goods—

James Duddridge Portrait Sir James Duddridge
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the Minister give way?

Victoria Atkins Portrait Victoria Atkins
- Hansard - -

May I finish the point, please? We need to ensure that Northern Ireland is not being used as a back door into the EU. I am coming at this matter not necessarily from the perspective of being particularly mindful of what may or may not happen in the single market—I do not know whether I am allowed to say that, but there we go—but because I do not want communities in Northern Ireland to be facing these pressures. I look across the room to those who know far better than I, but I am very conscious and have some small understanding of just how those pressures have been withstood valiantly in the past by communities in Northern Ireland. We want to do everything we can to support them in that and to ensure that they can continue to thrive.

--- Later in debate ---
Victoria Atkins Portrait Victoria Atkins
- Hansard - -

I remind the Committee that we are looking at parcels, not at freight—although of course there are extensions in that regard. Of course, if items are being imported into Great Britain via Dover, Harwich, Immingham or wherever, there are separate powers on those goods to protect communities in Great Britain and, I would argue, further afield. I acknowledge the difficulties, particularly for those representing Unionist interests in Northern Ireland, but we wish to move these issues forward, and the Windsor framework is a good deal for the United Kingdom as a whole.

We need powers now to stop non-Northern Irish recipients using Northern Ireland as a back door, which is why we are so keen to pass this provision quickly and to make progress. I imagine that businesses in Northern Ireland, and businesses in Great Britain that wish to conduct business with Northern Ireland, will want to ensure that we can do this as quickly as we can. This was a significant deal for the Government, and I absolutely understand and respect the wish to scrutinise it, but we have to move forwards with this.

James Duddridge Portrait Sir James Duddridge
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The list of goods seems quite general, and I was wondering whether there were more specifics. It refers to

“restricted goods, for example invasive alien species or ozone depleting substances”.

In particular, I am mindful of a company in Shoeburyness that exports seeds. It has already stopped exporting to some EU countries because of problems as a result of Brexit, but I could see it giving up unless there is a definitive list. Is there a list, or will one come out through a further SI?

Victoria Atkins Portrait Victoria Atkins
- Hansard - -

I want to ensure that I can provide the list to my hon. Friend now. However, just on that wider subject, the situation that he has described is exactly what we want to try to avoid in the future. He will know that there was uncertainty about how the protocol would apply. I think it was the chairman of Marks & Spencer at the time who came on to the radio at some point and talked about the 50 or so checks that M&S had to go through to send products to its stores in Northern Ireland. We want to cut through all of that, and I hope the Windsor framework will help the businesses in my hon. Friend’s constituency. I also hope that he will know that we are putting a great deal of effort into the trader support service to help businesses to navigate these new customs duties. Of course, that is in the freight space as well. The Government want to grow the economy and our relationship with businesses. I am very helpfully reminded that there is published guidance on gov.uk already, but I am happy to provide it separately to my hon. Friend if he wishes to see the complete list. It is published on there already.

--- Later in debate ---
Adam Afriyie Portrait Adam Afriyie
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the Minister give way?

Victoria Atkins Portrait Victoria Atkins
- Hansard - -

I give way to my hon. Friend the Member for Rochford and Southend East.

James Duddridge Portrait Sir James Duddridge
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I was standing to be called in the debate to make my 18 points; I was not asking the Minister to give way—apologies.