Information between 16th April 2024 - 6th May 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Calendar |
---|
Wednesday 8th May 2024 Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour - Life peer) Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: The High Court on ruling on the government's carbon budget delivery. View calendar |
Division Votes |
---|
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 84 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 154 |
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 102 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 177 |
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 112 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 192 |
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 110 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 192 |
22 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 124 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 211 |
17 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 123 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 245 Noes - 208 |
17 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 123 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 195 |
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 123 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 209 |
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 120 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 222 Noes - 222 |
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 114 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 208 |
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 128 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 238 Noes - 217 |
Written Answers |
---|
Fishing Vessels: Electric Vehicles
Asked by: Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 24th April 2024 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government when they will publish their response to the consultation on remote electronic fishing vessels, which ran from 17 July to 9 October 2023. Answered by Lord Douglas-Miller - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) We will be publishing responses soon and they will be available on GOV.UK. |
Plants and Trees: Import Controls
Asked by: Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour - Life peer) Monday 29th April 2024 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they have given to extending the place of destination (PoD) scheme to allow inspection of horticulture imports at a registered PoD until border control posts are fully functional for the purpose of plant and tree imports. Answered by Lord Douglas-Miller - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Defra is confident that existing and new Border Control Posts infrastructure will have sufficient capacity and capability to handle the volume of expected checks outlined in the Border Target Operating Model, with robust, dynamic, and effective operational measures ready to call upon if needed.
Looking ahead, we are piloting an ambitious programme of trusted trader assurance schemes for sanitary and phytosanitary goods. The pilots will explore how businesses can provide assurance through data, technology and trusted relationships and take increased responsibility for controls. |
Import Controls: Fees and Charges
Asked by: Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour - Life peer) Monday 29th April 2024 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the adequacy of border control posts ahead of the introduction of the common user charge on 30 April; and what assessment they have made of the likely impact of the common user charge on the UK’s environmental horticulture industry. Answered by Lord Douglas-Miller - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Defra is confident that existing and new BCP infrastructure will have sufficient capacity and capability to handle the volume of expected checks outlined in the Border Target Operating Model (BTOM), with robust, dynamic, and effective operational measures ready to call upon if needed.
Defra will continue to work with existing BCP operators to ensure they are prepared, and the Government has built new infrastructure at critical locations.
Operators have not expressed concerns regarding under-capacity, we are therefore not anticipating queues but will continue working closely with operators to address any concerns they may have.
The common user charge for BCP operating costs applies only to UK government-run BCPs. Commercial operators will independently set BCP charges for their own facilities.
The impact of the Common User Charge (CUC) on businesses of all sizes will be kept under monthly and quarterly reviews, with rates reviewed and updated annually.
Full details of the CUC can be found on GOV.UK. |
Bill Documents |
---|
May. 03 2024
HL Bill 39-R-I Marshalled list for Report Animal Welfare (Livestock Exports) Bill 2023-24 Amendment Paper Found: LORD DE CLIFFORD BARONESS HAYMAN OF ULLOCK 1_ After Clause 1, insert the following new Clause |