Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green

Information between 26th February 2024 - 6th May 2024

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 34 Crossbench Aye votes vs 11 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 228 Noes - 184
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 42 Crossbench Aye votes vs 1 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 160
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 65 Crossbench Aye votes vs 11 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 189
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 55 Crossbench Aye votes vs 9 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 181
6 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 44 Crossbench Aye votes vs 7 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 246 Noes - 171
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 32 Crossbench Aye votes vs 3 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 193
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 28 Crossbench Aye votes vs 5 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 192
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green voted Aye and against the House
One of 25 Crossbench Aye votes vs 10 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 199
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 25 Crossbench Aye votes vs 5 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 187
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 52 Crossbench Aye votes vs 16 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 263 Noes - 233
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 66 Crossbench Aye votes vs 11 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 226
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 71 Crossbench Aye votes vs 10 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 230
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green voted Aye and in line with the House
One of 57 Crossbench Aye votes vs 16 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 228
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green voted Aye and against the House
One of 21 Crossbench Aye votes vs 11 Crossbench No votes
Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 209


Written Answers
Gender Identity Services for Children and Young People Independent Review
Asked by: Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green (Crossbench - Life peer)
Monday 4th March 2024

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government when the final Cass report will be published; and how recommendations from this report will be consolidated into the consultation on the Government’s Guidance for Schools and Colleges: Gender Questioning Children, published on 19 December 2023.

Answered by Baroness Barran - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

The Cass Review is an independent review of NHS provision and is responsible for its own timetable. It is not directly considering practice in schools. The aim of the review is to ensure that children and young people who are questioning their gender identity or are experiencing gender dysphoria, and who need NHS support, receive a high standard of care that meets their needs and is safe, holistic and effective.

On 19 December 2023, the department published draft guidance for consultation. This consultation will run for twelve weeks and closes at 11:59pm on March 12 2024. The guidance applies to schools and colleges.

Once the consultation closes, the department will assess the responses before finalising the guidance for publication. Ministers and officials have engaged with the Cass Review to understand the latest evidence and will continue to do so. This includes reflecting any relevant evidence and conclusions from the final report in the guidance should the timetable allow to do so.

Students: Equality
Asked by: Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green (Crossbench - Life peer)
Monday 29th April 2024

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government why the Department for Education maintains named individuals' religious affiliation, sexual orientation, gender identity, and disability information from Higher Education equality monitoring data, rather than retaining the information as anonymised statistics.

Answered by Baroness Barran - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

The department does not directly collect information from higher education institutions concerning the religious affiliation, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability of students. However, the department does receive these variables from Jisc (and previously the Higher Education Statistics Authority) as part of the student records that they share with the department.

The information is held at a named level to enable this data to effectively function as a longitudinal research source, which can be used to compare educational pathways with other (non-educational) outcomes later in life. This will provide an evidence base against which society can evaluate and monitor the impact of education and training on outcomes and support government decision-making to improve services and ensure equality of opportunity for all irrespective of background or circumstances.

While individual identifiers are retained by the department for matching purposes, at all times the department will minimise the processing of, and access to, instant or meaningful identifiers. Access to named data within the department is restricted to a small number of data professionals with responsibility for matching this data with other sources and creating pseudonymised, or aggregated, versions of the data which are subsequently used for research and statistics.