Information between 16th April 2024 - 6th May 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 46 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 154 |
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 52 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 177 |
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 59 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 192 |
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 59 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 192 |
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 60 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 82 Noes - 211 |
22 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 68 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 211 |
17 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 68 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 245 Noes - 208 |
17 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 68 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 195 |
16 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 55 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 197 |
16 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 59 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 192 |
16 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 70 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 275 Noes - 218 |
16 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 70 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 253 Noes - 236 |
16 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 70 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 227 |
16 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 69 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 233 |
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 48 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 67 Noes - 175 |
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 55 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 208 |
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 54 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 209 |
30 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 59 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 238 Noes - 217 |
Written Answers |
---|
Ministers: Legal Costs
Asked by: Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Tuesday 30th April 2024 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Baroness Neville-Rolfe on 12 March (HL Deb col 1904), what were the specific grounds for approval of the legal expenses of the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology. Answered by Baroness Neville-Rolfe - Minister of State (Cabinet Office) In line with the established practice under multiple administrations of all political colours, Ministers are provided with legal support and representation where matters relate to their conduct and responsibilities as a Minister. As set out in Chapter 6 of the Cabinet Manual, Ministers are indemnified by the Crown for any actions taken against them for things done or decisions made in the course of their ministerial duties. The indemnity covers the cost of defending any proceedings, as well as costs or damages awarded against the minister. Decisions about whether to provide legal support are made by the relevant department’s Accounting Officer, as happened in this case. This reflects an important principle that Ministers should be able to carry out their official duties, supported by official advice, in a way which they see fit, without the risk of personal liability constraining their ability to take those official actions. Of course, Ministers remain accountable to Parliament and the wider public for their actions as a Minister. It would have a chilling effect on public life if Ministers faced the prospect of personal financial harm from those seeking to pressure the Government through vexatious or hostile litigation (or the threat thereof). More broadly, the principle of legal support from the public purse for official duties is not confined to government. I would observe that there is insurance available to members of the House of Commons, provided by that House at taxpayers’ expense, designed to protect those members when carrying out parliamentary and constituency duties. This includes professional indemnity insurance that covers defamation. I also note that the House of Lords Commission recently agreed in principle to provide professional indemnity insurance to members of this House.
|
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill
108 speeches (18,653 words) Consideration of Lords amendments Tuesday 30th April 2024 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade Mentions: 1: Sharon Hodgson (Lab - Washington and Sunderland West) co-chair of the all-party parliamentary group on ticket abuse Lord Moynihan, with the assistance of Lord - Link to Speech |
Data Protection and Digital Information Bill
149 speeches (26,104 words) Committee stage Wednesday 24th April 2024 - Grand Committee Department for Science, Innovation & Technology Mentions: 1: Viscount Younger of Leckie (Con - Excepted Hereditary) However, this chimes with a question from the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, so it might be helpful - Link to Speech 2: None I think that both the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, and I require answers to those questions. - Link to Speech 3: Viscount Camrose (Con - Excepted Hereditary) I start by thanking the noble Lords, Lord Clement-Jones and Lord Bassam, for their respective replies - Link to Speech 4: Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Lab - Life peer) My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, for introducing his amendments so ably. - Link to Speech |
Data Protection and Digital Information Bill
151 speeches (27,692 words) Committee stage Monday 22nd April 2024 - Grand Committee Department for Work and Pensions Mentions: 1: Lord Harlech (Con - Excepted Hereditary) On the point from the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, it is a question of your point of view; we feel - Link to Speech 2: Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Lab - Life peer) My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, for digging and delving into the background of - Link to Speech 3: Viscount Younger of Leckie (Con - Excepted Hereditary) I have a response to the question from the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, about signals. - Link to Speech |
Artificial Intelligence in Weapon Systems Committee Report
35 speeches (13,802 words) Friday 19th April 2024 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Defence Mentions: 1: Earl of Minto (Con - Excepted Hereditary) The noble Lords, Lord Lisvane and Lord Clement-Jones, and the noble Lord, Lord Browne of Ladyton, who - Link to Speech 2: Lord Lisvane (XB - Life peer) I especially thank the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, whose idea it originally was that the committee - Link to Speech |
Data Protection and Digital Information Bill
117 speeches (25,336 words) Committee stage Wednesday 17th April 2024 - Grand Committee Department for Science, Innovation & Technology Mentions: 1: None The noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, made an excellent case and, for the reasons given, I support his - Link to Speech 2: Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Lab - Life peer) My Lords, I listened carefully to the explanation given by the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, for his - Link to Speech 3: Viscount Camrose (Con - Excepted Hereditary) My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, and the noble Baroness, Lady Jones, for tabling - Link to Speech 4: Viscount Camrose (Con - Excepted Hereditary) I thank the noble Lords, Lord Clement-Jones and Lord Bassam, for their comments. - Link to Speech |
Data Protection and Digital Information Bill
93 speeches (24,613 words) Committee stage Monday 15th April 2024 - Grand Committee Department for Science, Innovation & Technology Mentions: 1: Lord Kirkhope of Harrogate (Con - Life peer) I also thank the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, for his support. - Link to Speech 2: Lord Bethell (Con - Excepted Hereditary) I start by saying a huge thanks to the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, and my noble friend Lord Kirkhope - Link to Speech 3: Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Lab - Life peer) My Lords, I am very grateful to the noble Lords, Lord Clement-Jones, Lord Bethell and Lord Kirkhope, - Link to Speech 4: Viscount Camrose (Con - Excepted Hereditary) As such, I hope that the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, will agree not to press these amendments. - Link to Speech 5: Baroness Morgan of Cotes (Con - Life peer) I also thank the noble Lords, Lord Clement-Jones and Lord Bassam, for their support. - Link to Speech |
Select Committee Documents |
---|
Tuesday 23rd April 2024
Oral Evidence - Department for Education, Department for Education, and Centre for Economic Performance Skills for the future: apprenticeships and training - Industry and Regulators Committee Found: Q5 Lord Clement-Jones: I have three rather broad questions. |
Parliamentary Research |
---|
Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill: Lords stages and amendments - CBP-10008
Apr. 24 2024 Found: In committee, Lord Clement -Jones (LD) spoke to amendments to clauses 157 and 181, which sought to |
Calendar |
---|
Tuesday 23rd April 2024 10:30 a.m. Industry and Regulators Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Skills for the future: apprenticeships and training View calendar |
Tuesday 23rd April 2024 10:30 a.m. Industry and Regulators Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Skills for the future: apprenticeships and training At 10:30am: Oral evidence The Rt Hon Robert Halfon MP - Former Minister of State for Skills, Apprenticeships and Higher Education at Department for Education The Rt Hon Charles Clarke - Former Education Secretary at Department for Education Lord Layard - Co-director of the Community Wellbeing programme at Centre for Economic Performance View calendar |
Tuesday 30th April 2024 10:30 a.m. Industry and Regulators Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Skills for the future: apprenticeships and training At 10:30am: Oral evidence Jennifer Coupland - Chief Executive at Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education At 11:30am: Oral evidence Sally Andreou - Skills Hub Manager at Oxfordshire Local Enterprise Partnership Pat Jackson - Director Skills and Education at Enterprise Cheshire & Warrington Jane Gratton - Deputy Director for Policy at British Chambers of Commerce View calendar |
Tuesday 14th May 2024 10:30 a.m. Industry and Regulators Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Skills for the future: apprenticeships and training View calendar |
Tuesday 7th May 2024 10 a.m. Industry and Regulators Committee - Private Meeting View calendar |
Tuesday 21st May 2024 10:30 a.m. Industry and Regulators Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Skills for the future: apprenticeships and training At 10:30am: Oral evidence David Hughes CBE - Chief Executive at Association of Colleges Ben Rowland - Chief Executive Officer at Association of Employment and Learning Providers At 11:30am: Oral evidence Alexia Williams - Apprentice Panel Member at Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education James Stephenson - Apprentice Panel Member at Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education Sian Elliott - Senior Policy Officer at Trades Union Congress View calendar |
Tuesday 21st May 2024 10:30 a.m. Industry and Regulators Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Skills for the future: apprenticeships and training View calendar |
Select Committee Inquiry |
---|
17 Apr 2024
Skills for the future: apprenticeships and training Industry and Regulators Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The Industry and Regulators Committee has launched an inquiry into skills policy, focusing in particular on apprenticeships and training, and in the context of the skills the UK workforce needs for the future. The inquiry will examine whether the UK’s current systems and policies for apprenticeships and in-work training are working and, if not, how they should be reformed. In doing so, the inquiry will consider the responsibilities of government, employers, training providers, and individuals, and the incentives facing these groups. |