Public Bodies: Reform

(Limited Text - Ministerial Extracts only)

Read Full debate
Thursday 14th October 2010

(13 years, 6 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Hansard Text
Lord Boateng Portrait Lord Boateng
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the Caribbean Board is to be—

Baroness Verma Portrait Baroness Verma
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, perhaps the Cross Benches can come in and then the noble Lord.

Baroness Prashar Portrait Baroness Prashar
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I stepped down as chairman of the Judicial Appointments Commission after my five-year term at the end of September. Thankfully, that commission is to be retained. However, the body was set up five years ago to enhance the independence of the judiciary and to make the process for selecting judges more open and transparent. We are of course accountable to Parliament through making an annual report to the Lord Chancellor.

The process for determining the review was less than transparent and the communication could have been better. Of course, there are second-order things in terms of efficiency which can be dealt with through a constructive dialogue between the chair, the chief executive and the commissioners, but the uncertainty still hangs about the type of reform. That kind of uncertainty, which causes a distraction from your core function, leads to waste. I suggest that it would be helpful to get some indication that there is some efficiency in how the actual reviews are conducted, that a distinction can be made between the types of quangos that are being put under review and the ones that are being retained and that those decisions will be communicated quickly to those concerned.