All 4 Petitions debates in the Commons on 10th Sep 2013

Petitions

Tuesday 10th September 2013

(10 years, 8 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Tuesday 10 September 2013

Tougher Legislation on Dangerous Dogs

Tuesday 10th September 2013

(10 years, 8 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The Petition of residents of Bolton West,
Declares that seven children and two adults have been killed by dogs since 2006, and that 6,000 admissions to hospital are caused by dog attacks each year leaving many victims scarred for life; notes that the introduction of Dog Control Notices is supported by many organisations including the Kennel Club, the Dogs Trust, RSPCA, Royal College of Nursing, British Veterinary Association and the Communication Workers Union; and believes that the Government’s current proposals on dangerous dogs do not go far enough.
The Petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Government to amend the law to cover attacks on people and animals on both private and public property, to enforce Dog Control Orders, to introduce Dog Control Notices giving the authorities the power to intervene, to introduce the compulsory micro-chipping of all dogs and to promote responsible dog ownership, including training owners and dogs.
And the Petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Julie Hilling, Official Report, 16 July 2013; Vol. 566, c. 1063.]
[P001200]
Petitions in the same terms were presented by the right hon. Member for Wythenshawe and Sale East (Paul Goggins) [P001201]; the hon. Member for Bolton South East (Yasmin Qureshi) [P001202]; the hon. Member for Liverpool, Wavertree (Luciana Berger) [P001203]; the hon. Member for Stretford and Urmston (Kate Green) [P001204]; the hon. Member for Washington and Sunderland West (Mrs Hodgson) [P001205]; the hon. Member for Scunthorpe (Nic Dakin) [P001206]; the hon. Member for Lewisham East (Heidi Alexander) [P001207]; and the hon. Member for Blackpool South (Mr Marsden) [P001208].
Observations from the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:
The Government thank the petitioners for raising this important issue in the House of Commons. The Government are committed to encouraging more responsible dog ownership and agree that dog attacks causing death or injury are unacceptable and must be tackled. For this reason, the Government announced a package of measures on 6 February 2013 to encourage more responsible dog ownership.
The Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill 2013, currently in the House of Commons, extends the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 so that the offence of having a dog dangerously out of control applies regardless of whether it occurs on public or private property. This will provide the police and the Crown Prosecution Service with an appropriate legal base for taking forward prosecutions as necessary. The Bill also creates an explicit offence where a dog is dangerously out of control in relation to an assistance dog such as a guide dog. The Government look forward to the successful progression of this Bill to the House of Lords before it receives Royal Assent.
The same Bill will also provide practitioners with faster and more flexible powers that allow them to tackle all types of anti-social behaviour within communities. For example, the Community Protection Notice is an early intervention power that will allow officers to address irresponsible dog ownership in any form. Notices served could require an individual to remedy their behaviour by attending a dog behaviour or training class for example. The adaptability of these powers removes the need for numerous stand-alone notices for each separate form of anti-social behaviour and also allows officers to develop innovative local solutions that address the cause as well as the effect of the behaviour.
In addition, the Government are drafting regulations so that microchipping for all dogs will be compulsory from April 2016. This welfare measure will allow for quicker reunification of lost pets with their owners and significantly reduce the time stray dogs spend in kennels, which is distressing for both dogs and owners.
Further work on the education of owners and to tackle the advertising of pets online is also underway. The Government are grateful to all petitioners for upholding the traditions of excellent animal welfare in this country.

Christians in Pakistan

Tuesday 10th September 2013

(10 years, 8 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The Petition of residents of Nelson, Lancashire, and others,
Declares that they condemn the attacks that took place in March 2013 that targeted Christians in Lahore, Pakistan, where two churches and 178 homes were burnt, and regrets the actions of the local authorities in the city who failed to protect the buildings from attack.
The Petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Government of Pakistan to remove any laws that discriminate against minorities, abolish the blasphemy laws, release Asia Bibi, and to provide protection and security when such incidents occur in future.
And the Petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Andrew Stephenson, Official Report, 4 July 2013; Vol. 565, c. 1160.]
[P001191]
Observations from the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs:
I understand and sympathise with those who have signed the petition. I share your concerns regarding religious persecution in Pakistan. The British Government strongly condemn all instances of violence and in particular the killing of innocent people based on their faith or ethnicity. Foreign and Commonwealth Office Ministers regularly urge the Government of Pakistan to protect and guarantee the fundamental human rights of all people in Pakistan. For example, Senior Minister of State Baroness Warsi publically condemned the attacks on the Christian community in Lahore on 9 March and spoke to Pakistan’s Minister for National Harmony and Minority Affairs. During my trip to Lahore in July, I met with the leaders of various religious communities at a multi-faith event where we discussed the issue of religious freedom in Pakistan.
Last year, former President Zardari publically acknowledged the problems faced by Pakistan’s minorities and emphasised his support for ending discrimination. However, Pakistan still has a long way to go to deal with these issues and we will do all we can to support the new Government in their efforts.
I remain very concerned over the case of Asia Bibi. Sadly, there have been very few developments in the last year despite the fact that, alongside our European Union (EU) partners, we regularly engage with the authorities in Pakistan on her case, calling for a free and fair trial and urging the Pakistani authorities to properly implement the blasphemy laws to reduce instances of their misuse. EU High Representative Baroness Ashton raised Mrs Bibi’s case with the Governor of Punjab during her visit in June 2012. In October 2012 Baroness Warsi raised her case and concerns about the treatment of minorities with the Chief Minister of Punjab, Shahbaz Sharif, during his visit to London. We will continue to raise Asia Bibi’s case, as appropriate, with the Government of Pakistan.
The British Government regularly raise the issue of the blasphemy laws, and their misuse against both religious minorities and Muslims, with the authorities in Pakistan. Reform of the blasphemy laws is a particularly sensitive subject in Pakistan, but this does not deter us from raising these matters. Through our High Commission in Islamabad, we are continuing to encourage interfaith dialogue and support those in Pakistan who are working for reform of the blasphemy laws.
Baroness Warsi, Senior Minister of State, hosted a Freedom of Religion and Belief Ministerial conference in London on 22 January and was able to discuss these issues in detail with the Pakistani Human Rights Minister. We will continue to engage with the authorities in Pakistan to promote freedom of religion or belief.

Abolishment of the Probation Service

Tuesday 10th September 2013

(10 years, 8 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The Petition of Residents of the UK,
Declares that the Petitioners oppose the Government’s plan to abolish the Probation Service in its current form and to privatise up to 70% of work currently undertaken by it. The Petitioners believe that those convicted by a Criminal Court should be supervised by those employed by a publicly accountable Probation Service such as currently exists; further that the Petitioners oppose the Government’s plan to abolish the 35 public sector Probation Trusts replacing them with one Probation Service that only supervises those deemed to be of a high risk of harm to the public. It is envisaged under the current plan 70% of probation work will be subject to a competitive process which excludes the Probation Service. We believe that such a plan is “high risk” in that it could place the public at a greater risk of harm.
The Petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to stop the planned changes to the Probation Service.
And the Petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Mrs Anne Main, Official Report, 16 July 2013; Vol. 566, c. 7P.]
[P001213]
Observations from the Secretary of State for Justice:
Reoffending rates in this country have been too high for too long. Last year, around 600,000 crimes were committed by people who had broken the law before. Almost half of all offenders released from our prisons offend again within a year. That goes up to almost 60% for those sentenced to prison terms of under 12 months.
The pressing need to drive down reoffending rates means that we need to look again at the way offenders are rehabilitated. This is why, on 9 May 2013, the Secretary of State for Justice, Chris Grayling, announced new measures to ensure that, for the first time, every offender released from custody receives a minimum of 12 months supervision and rehabilitation in the community. The Government are legislating to extend this statutory supervision and rehabilitation to the most prolific group of offenders—those sentenced to fewer than 12 months in custody.
We are also putting in place an unprecedented nationwide “through the prison gate” resettlement service, meaning offenders will be given continuous support by one provider from custody into the community. We will facilitate this by ensuring that most offenders are held in a prison designated to their area for at least three months before release.
We want to draw on the best services that can be offered by practitioners across the public, private and voluntary sectors, so that we can deliver better support to more offenders. This is why we are opening up the market to a diverse range of new rehabilitation providers. These providers, who will deliver services across 21 Contract Package Areas, will have the freedom to innovate and to focus on turning around the lives of offenders but will only be paid in full for real reductions in reoffending. Our plans will also use competition to drive greater efficiency, which is vital to free up the resources we need so that we can extend rehabilitation to a wider group of offenders.
The competition process has been designed, as far as possible, to allow a range of different kinds of entities to be able to bid to deliver services. This could include alternative delivery vehicles and mutuals designed by individuals within existing Probation Trusts. All bidders will need to demonstrate that they reach the required quality standards across all elements. The Contract Package Areas are of a variety of sizes and values, in order to make sure more medium and small organisations—including mutuals designed by existing probation staff—can join bids to take part in delivery of services.
Public protection remains our primary priority. This is why we are creating a new National Probation Service, working to protect the public and building upon the expertise and professionalism which are already in place. Probation staff make a vital contribution to protecting the public from the most dangerous offenders and will continue to do so. Under the new system, every offender who poses a high risk of serious harm to the public will be managed by the public sector probation service.
We also recognise that risk levels can change, which is why we have designed a system where cases will be referred by the provider to the National Probation Service for a reassessment of risk if there is a significant change in the offender’s circumstances, or intelligence received indicates that the risk of serious harm may have escalated to high. If the National Probation Service assesses the case as having escalated to high it will take over the responsibility for that case. New providers will have contractual obligations to work in partnership with the public sector probation service in managing risk of serious harm.
Our Transforming Rehabilitation reforms form part of a radical programme of reform across the whole justice system, making it ready to meet the challenges of the future by reforming offenders, delivering value for the taxpayer and protecting victims and communities.