Petitions

Monday 9th October 2017

(6 years, 7 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Monday 9 October 2017

Climate Change

Monday 9th October 2017

(6 years, 7 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of Macclesfield,
Declares that climate changes impacts upon both people and places; further that on the global stage the UK should exercise leadership in the implementation of the Paris Agreement, ensure coordination between government departments in the production and implementation of plans for emissions reduction with particular emphasis on local energy, cutting energy waste in homes and reducing the impact of vehicles on the environment.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Prime Minister to give priority to the urgent issue of global Climate Change.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by David Rutley , Official Report, 19 July 2017; Vol. 627, c. 8P .]
[P002047]
Observations from the Minister of State, Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (Claire Perry):
Climate change is one of the most urgent and pressing challenges we face today, and the UK remains committed to demonstrating global leadership in tackling it.
The UK played a leading role in negotiating the Paris Agreement and the Prime Minister, along with other global leaders, has re-affirmed our strong commitment to the Paris Agreement and its swift implementation, as well as our view that the Agreement is irreversible. The Prime Minister has made clear that we believe that the Paris Agreement provides the right global framework for protecting the prosperity and security of future generations, while keeping energy affordable and secure for our citizens and businesses.
The UK has shown global leadership in cutting emissions while growing our economy. We have met the first carbon budget (2008-2012) and we are on track to meet the second (2013- 2017) and third carbon budgets (2018-2022).In delivering these targets, we have led the world in reducing emissions while growing our economy. Since 1990, we have cut emissions by more than 40% while our economy has grown by two thirds. We were recently ranked by the independent Climate Action Network as the third best country in the world for tackling climate change, and PwC's Low Carbon Economy Index shows that the UK has been the fastest of any country in the G20 to decarbonise in 2016.
The UK is well placed to take advantage of the huge economic opportunities of the transition to a low carbon economy. Our early action on clean growth means that we have nurtured a broad range of low carbon industries, including some sectors in which we have world-leading positions. Around 430,000 people are employed in the low carbon sector and its supply chain, and a recent report for the Committee on Climate Change estimated that the UK low carbon economy could grow by an estimated 11% per year between 2015 and 2030—four times faster than the rest of the economy.
Our leadership covers a range of sectors. For example, our financial sector is already a world-leader in green finance. We recently announced a package of measures, including the establishment of a Green Finance Taskforce, to build on our leadership position.
The UK’s International Climate Fund (ICF) is the UK’s primary international instrument to help deliver the Paris Climate Agreement; we are committed to spend at least £5.8 billion between 2016 and 2021 to build renewable energy projects, halt deforestation and increase private investment in low carbon technologies around the world. Over the past five years, the ICF has supported 34 million people to cope with the effects of climate change and improved access to clean energy for 12 million people. The finance has also installed more than 400 MW of clean energy capacity, reduced or avoided 9.2 million tonnes of CO2 and mobilised £2.2 billion public finance and £500 million private finance for climate change purposes in developing countries.
As a part of the ICF, the UK led the way in bringing the international community together to set up the first major global climate funds, the $8.3 billion Climate Investment Funds (CIFs). CIFs have:
Driven low carbon climate resilient development in 73 countries, leveraging $45 billion of co-financing and creating over 9,000 jobs in the Clean Technology Fund (CTF) alone;
Embedded national climate planning in governments across the world;
Shifted Global Finance Architecture and raised global reporting standards.
The UK also leads the world on International Development. In 2015 we were the only G7 country to achieve the UN target of spending 0.7% of Gross National Income as Official Development Assistance (ODA). This 0.7% commitment has been enshrined in UK law since 2015—demonstrating the UK’s moral commitment to help the billions of people around the world who live in poverty.
Our Clean Growth Strategy will set out our proposals for decarbonising the UK economy through the 2020s, building on the impressive progress to date.

Climate change objectives and obligations

Monday 9th October 2017

(6 years, 7 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of the residents of Dulwich and West Norwood,
Declares that there is widespread concern that the Government is not on track to meet the fourth or fifth carbon budgets; welcomes the Prime Minister’s continued verbal commitment to the Paris Agreement; notes that in order to meet the UK’s commitment to achieve the carbon budget action is necessary; further notes that the Committee on Climate Change reported in June 2017 and concluded that the UK can successfully navigate the transition to a growing, low-carbon economy but new policies to deliver that transition are overdue; and further notes that much domestic legislation for reducing emissions and tackling climate changes is either contingent on the UK’s membership of the European Union or ends in or around 2020, including but not limited to the levy control framework supporting low carbon power, fuel efficiency standards for new cars, renewable heat incentives, capital funding for flood defences to protect homes and businesses and targeted biodiversity plans to help build the resilience of the natural environment to climate change.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to lay before the House their plans for meeting the fourth and fifth carbon budgets, as well as committing to protecting existing environmental protections.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Helen Hayes , Official Report, 19 July 2017; Vol. 627, c. 949 .]
[P002046]
Observations from the Minister of State, Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (Claire Perry):
The Government are committed to tackling climate change and to the UK’s Climate Change Act. The Act introduced carbon budgets to put us on a pathway to meet our legally binding 2050 target to reduce emissions by at least 80% against 1990 levels. We have met the first carbon budget (2008-2012) and we are on track to meet the second (2013-2017) and third carbon budgets (2018-2022).
In delivering these targets, we have led the world in reducing emissions while growing our economy. Since 1990, we have cut emissions by more than 40% while our economy has grown by two thirds—meaning that we have reduced emissions faster than any other G7 nation on a per person basis. We were recently ranked by the independent Climate Action Network as the third best country in the world for tackling climate change, and PwC’s Low Carbon Economy Index shows that the UK has been the fastest of any country in the G20 to decarbonise in 2016.
The UK is also well placed to take advantage of the huge economic opportunities of the transition to a low carbon economy. Our early action on clean growth means that we have nurtured a broad range of low carbon industries, including some sectors in which we have world-leading positions. Around 430,000 people are employed in the low carbon sector and its supply chain, and a recent report for the Committee on Climate Change estimated that the UK low carbon economy could grow by an estimated 11% per year between 2015 and 2030—four times faster than the rest of the economy.
Our leadership covers a range of sectors. For example, our financial sector is already a world-leader in green finance. We recently announced a package of measures, including the establishment of a Green Finance Taskforce, to build on our leadership position.
The UK played a leading role in negotiating the Paris Agreement, and the Prime Minister has made clear that we believe that the Agreement provides the right global framework for protecting the prosperity and security of future generations, while keeping energy affordable and secure for our citizens and businesses.
Our Clean Growth Strategy will set out our proposals for decarbonising the UK economy through the 2020s, building on the impressive progress to date. We are working to ensure that our strategy is ambitious and robust, and will publish it shortly.

School funding formula in Calderdale

Monday 9th October 2017

(6 years, 7 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the UK,
Declares that the proposed national school funding formula would see reductions to the budgets of schools in Calderdale at a time when finances are already stretched; and further that an online petition on this matter received 1,042 signatures.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Secretary of State for Education to reconsider the proposed national school funding formula to ensure that Calderdale schools do not lose out and that no school receives less than £4800 per pupil.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Holly Lynch , Official Report, 25 April 2017; Vol. 624, c. 1067 .]
[P002034]
Observations from the Minister for School Standards (Nick Gibb):
The Secretary of State announced the final details of the national funding formulae for schools and high needs on September 14, following the consultation launched in December 2016. All Calderdale schools will be allocated increased funding through the formula.
The introduction of the national funding formulae is supported by significant extra investment of £1.3 billion across 2018-19 and 2019-20, over and above the spending levels announced in the 2015 Autumn Statement. Core funding for schools and high needs will rise from almost £41 billion in 2017-18 to £42.4 billion in 2018-19 and £43.5 billion in 2019-20. This will allow us to maintain school and high needs funding in real terms per pupil for the next two years.
This additional investment has allowed us to build on the proposals in our consultation. As a result, the national funding formula will:
Recognise the challenges of the very lowest funded schools, by introducing a minimum per pupil funding level. Under the national funding formula, in 2019-20 all secondary schools will attract at least £4,800 per pupil, and all primary schools will attract at least £3,500 per pupil. In 2018-19, as a step towards these minimum funding levels, secondary schools will attract at least £4,600, and primary schools £3,300.
Provide a cash increase in respect of every school and every local area from April 2018. Final decisions on local distribution will be taken by local authorities, but under the national funding formula every school will attract at least 0.5% more per pupil in 2018-19, and 1% more in 2019-20, compared to its baseline.
Increase the basic amount of funding that every pupil will attract.
Provide significantly larger increases in respect of underfunded schools, of up to 3% per pupil in 2018-19 and a further 3% per pupil in 2019-20. The minimum per pupil funding level will not be subject to this gains cap, and so will deliver faster gains in respect of the very lowest funded schools.
The final national funding formula for schools therefore meets the requests outlined in the petition.
Full details on formula allocations can be found here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-funding-formula-tables-for-schools-and-high-needs.
These include notional school level allocations showing what each school would attract through the formula. As the Secretary of State set out in July, to provide stability for schools through the transition to the national funding formula, local authorities will continue to set their own local formulae which will determine individual schools’ budgets in their areas, in 2018-19 and 2019-20, in consultation with local schools.

Closure of Marske Medical Centre

Monday 9th October 2017

(6 years, 7 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of Marske and New Marske in the Redcar Constituency.
Declares that the decision to close the Medical Centre of Hall Close, Marske-by-the-Sea, will leave over 5,000 patients, many of whom are elderly, without a local medical practice, and require them to travel to neighbouring towns to register with a General Practitioner.
The Petitioners therefore request the House of Commons to urge the Government to prevent the closure of the Marske Medical Centre.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Anna Turley , Official Report, 25 April 2017; Vol. 624, c. 1069 .]
[P002037]
Observations from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health (Steve Brine):
There is a system in place to ensure that service changes are scrutinised and challenged through formal processes. This system is based on the principle that it is right that decisions regarding local service changes are led by local clinicians, who best understand the healthcare needs of their population.
South Tees Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) closed Marske Medical Practice on 30 June after four unsuccessful attempts to find a provider for the service. The vast majority of former Marske Medical Practice patients (approximately 4,600) have now registered with another practice. There are approximately 500 patients who have yet to do so. The CCG has issued another letter to all these patients requesting them to register with another practice and provided support on how to do this.
Surrounding practices are coping with the influx of patients and have increased staffing levels to manage demand.

Continuation of local bus services in Congleton Constituency

Monday 9th October 2017

(6 years, 7 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the UK,
Declares that it is the opinion of Alsager residents, shop keepers and market traders that plans to close the 315 local bus service are ill-considered, and will have a disproportionate impact on Alsager as a whole; further that the 315 service should be retained; and further that a local petition has received 201 signatures
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Government to support the retaining of the 315 bus service.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Fiona Bruce , Official Report, 20 July 2017; Vol. 627, c. 1097 .]
[P002050]
Observations from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Jesse Norman):
I recognise the importance of public transport for both the sustainability and independence of communities. Inadequate transport provision is a very real concern and can be a barrier to the prosperity of all.
Where there is not enough demand for a bus route to be commercially viable in its own right, all local authorities in England have powers to subsidise bus services which they consider socially necessary.
The Government provides around £250 million to support bus services in England via the Bus Service Operators Grant (BSOG), around £40 million of which goes direct to the local authorities who tender those services. Cheshire East Council’s share of this is £347,000. Councils can use this money to support bus services in whatever way they see fit.
I strongly encourage local authorities and bus operators to work together, in consultation with local residents and businesses, to identify the right transport solutions that meet the economic and environmental challenges faced in the area and deliver the greatest benefits for the community.

Local Bus Services in Torbay

Monday 9th October 2017

(6 years, 7 months ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of users of the No.65 bus service in Torbay,
Declares that the cancellation of the number 65 bus service between The Willows to Torquay via Hele, Babbacombe, Quinta, Ellacombe and St Marychurch will have a detrimental impact on local residents, in particular, elderly residents.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges Torbay Council to commit to providing a similar service to the previous No. 65 service for the sake of the local residents as soon as possible
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Kevin Foster, Official Report, 06 September 2017; Vol. 628, c. 275 .]
[P002052]
Observations from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Jesse Norman):
I recognise the importance of public transport for both the sustainability and independence of communities. Inadequate transport provision is a very real concern and can be a barrier to the prosperity of all.
Where there is not enough demand for a bus route to be commercially viable in its own right, all local authorities in England have powers to subsidise bus services which they consider socially necessary.
Decisions on subsidised bus services are a matter for individual English local authorities, in the light of their other spending priorities. We fully appreciate that local authorities are making difficult choices as a result of continuing financial pressures.
The majority of public funding for local bus services is via block grant provided to local authorities in England from the Department for Communities and Local Government. The Department for Transport also provides around £40 million of Bus Service Operators Grant funding directly to English local authorities to help deliver bus services, of which Torbay Council receives around £22,450. Councils can use this money to support bus services in whatever way they see fit.
The Bus Services Act 2017 introduced a number of new tools to help local authorities improve local bus services in their area. Through partnership arrangements we have enabled local authorities and bus operators to work more constructively together to provide better services for passengers.
I strongly encourage local authorities and bus operators to work together, in consultation with local residents and businesses, to identify local transport solutions that meet the economic and environmental challenges faced in the area and deliver the greatest benefits for the community.