Petitions

Monday 26th October 2026

(2 days, 22 hours ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Monday 26 October 2026

Council tax discounts for dementia

Monday 26th October 2026

(2 days, 22 hours ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the United Kingdom
Declares that there are over 600,000 people with dementia who receive care at home; further that people with dementia are only disregarded for council tax if they have a medical certificate and are in receipt of certain benefits; further that this means that many people with dementia have to wait months or years to qualify for council tax discounts after they have been diagnosed; and further that, if council tax disregards were backdated to the date a person was certified as being severely mentally impaired, people with dementia could receive additional council tax discounts for longer periods and potentially save thousands of pounds.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to require that council tax disregards are backdated to the date a person was certified as being severely mentally impaired, where they then go on to qualify for a relevant benefit.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Rishi Sunak.]
[P003252]

Safe Reopening of Mount Batten Beach and Peninsula

Monday 26th October 2026

(2 days, 22 hours ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the constituency of South West Devon and the surrounding area,
Declares that the continued closure of Mount Batten Beach peninsula is having a significant impact on local residents, sea swimmers, water sports users, businesses and the wider community; further declares that residents want to see the site reopened safely as soon as possible; further notes that specialist expertise is required to identify the source of the asbestos contamination and determine the steps needed to enable the safe reopening of the site.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government and Plymouth City Council to do whatever it takes to secure the necessary specialist expertise as soon as possible, provide the community with clear answers on the next steps, and work at pace towards the safe reopening of Mount Batten Beach and peninsula.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Rebecca Smith, Official Report, 14 September 2026; Vol. 790, c. 1546.]
[P003237]
Observations from the Minister of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Emma Hardy):
I would like to thank the community of South West Devon for raising this issue of asbestos contamination on Mount Batten beach. The Government recognise how important these sites are for local residents and businesses, and would like to see it open as soon as it is deemed safe to do so.
Operational responsibility for the investigation of the contamination and any further decisions on the future of Mount Batten beach lie with Plymouth city council. The Government are working with the relevant authorities to continue their assessments and ensure the safety of the site. It expects that all affected communities will be kept informed of this work as it progresses.
Plymouth city council has created a dedicated webpage, https://www.plymouth.gov.uk/mount-batten-beach that provides updates on its investigations and to provide information to the local community. While the source of asbestos contamination is currently unknown, any further information will be communicated to ensure the safety of the local community.
The UK Health Security Agency has been working with Plymouth city council by providing specialist public health advice while assessments take place. It does not hold any regulatory or enforcement powers in relation to beach management or environmental investigations and so it is assisting in an advisory capacity.
The Government recognise the concerns raised by residents. The Department will continue to support any actions taken by the relevant bodies and expects the responsible authorities to continue their investigations and communicate clearly with affected communities. Decisions on any reopening of the beach must be informed by the relevant evidence and statutory responsibilities.

Highway Safety Measures at Cubert Crossroads

Monday 26th October 2026

(2 days, 22 hours ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of Cubert, St Newlyn East and the surrounding areas,
Declares that visibility at Cubert Crossroads falls below national standards for a 60 mph road, putting road users at risk of accidents and fatalities; further declares that during the summer months traffic volumes increase significantly due to seasonal visitors who are unfamiliar with the junction, increasing the risk; further declares that current cost-benefit approaches to road safety infrastructure undervalue the risks faced on rural roads and junctions; and further declares that the urgent implementation of highway safety measures, such as average speed cameras, a restriction on turning, traffic lights, or a roundabout, is needed to protect local communities and visitors using this junction.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to support the campaign to ensure that Cubert Crossroads has appropriate highway safety measures in place, recognising the importance of having a safe crossroads that does not put road users at risk.
And the petitioners remain, etc. —[Presented by Jayne Kirkham, Official Report, 12 October 2026; Vol. 791, c. 147.]
[P003243]
Observations from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Justin Madders):
The Government recognise the concerns raised by residents of Cubert, St Newlyn East and the surrounding areas about safety at Cubert Crossroads.
The safety of all road users is a priority for the Department. The Government support local authorities in considering appropriate, evidence-led measures to address risks on their road networks. Depending on local circumstances, these may include changes to junction layouts, traffic signals, turning restrictions, speed management measures and safety camera enforcement.
Responsibility for assessing the need for safety measures on local roads rests with the relevant local highway authority. For Cubert Crossroads, this is Cornwall council. The council is best placed to assess the junction and determine which measures would be appropriate, taking account of local conditions.
The Department for Transport provides guidance to support local decision making. Authorities should consider relevant evidence, including traffic speeds and volumes, road layout and visibility, collision history, the mix of road users and wider community concerns. Seasonal changes in traffic and the circumstances of rural roads and junctions may also form part of that assessment.
While the Government cannot direct Cornwall council to implement a particular scheme at Cubert Crossroads, I would encourage the petitioners to continue engaging with the council, so that the concerns raised, and the range of possible interventions, can be considered through its local road safety responsibilities. I am grateful to the petitioners, and to my hon. Friend the Member for Truro and Falmouth (Jayne Kirkham), for highlighting these important road safety concerns at Cubert Crossroads.