To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Speech in Lords Chamber - Tue 05 Dec 2023
Sexually Transmitted Infections

Speech Link

View all Baroness Cumberlege (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Sexually Transmitted Infections

Speech in Lords Chamber - Thu 09 Nov 2023
King’s Speech

Speech Link

View all Baroness Cumberlege (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: King’s Speech

Written Question
Ultrasonics
Wednesday 25th October 2023

Asked by: Baroness Cumberlege (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to protect patients from (1) unregulated, and (2) unqualified, non-medical ultrasound practitioners.

Answered by Lord Markham - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Government is clear that the regulatory oversight of health and care professions must be proportionate to the risks to the public. Statutory regulation of healthcare professionals should only be used where the risks to patient protection cannot be addressed through employer oversight, system regulation, or accredited voluntary registration.

Services offering diagnostic and screening procedures that use ultrasound to examine the body must register with the Care Quality Commission (CQC). Providers must demonstrate that they provide enough suitably qualified, competent, skilled, and experienced staff to meet the needs of the people using the service to comply with the CQC’s regulatory requirements to operate.

Some sonographers are qualified and registered to practice in another healthcare profession that is subject to statutory regulation. The Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care manages the Accredited Registers Programme which independently assesses organisations who operate voluntary registers for practitioners who are not regulated by law. Sonographers can register with the accredited Register of Clinical Technologists.

The Government keeps the healthcare professions subject to statutory regulation under review and recently ran a consultation seeking views on the criteria used to decide when regulation is necessary, and whether there are any unregulated professions that should be brought into statutory regulation. The Government will publish its response to the consultation in due course.


Division Vote (Lords)
18 Oct 2023 - Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 192 Conservative No votes vs 3 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 245 Noes - 204
Division Vote (Lords)
18 Oct 2023 - Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 197 Conservative No votes vs 3 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 245 Noes - 209
Division Vote (Lords)
5 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 166 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 185
Division Vote (Lords)
5 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 155 Conservative No votes vs 7 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 169
Division Vote (Lords)
5 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 163 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 178
Division Vote (Lords)
3 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 148 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 168
Division Vote (Lords)
3 Jul 2023 - Illegal Migration Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Cumberlege (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 145 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 147