All 1 Debates between Baroness Ludford and Lord Harlech

Mon 6th Mar 2023

Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

Debate between Baroness Ludford and Lord Harlech
Baroness Ludford Portrait Baroness Ludford (LD)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I apologise if I am interrupting the Minister before he has finished; I think he is replying to Amendments 85 and 88, although he did not specifically refer to them. He dismisses the need for the factors introduced in those amendments because he says the courts can have regard to them anyway. Why have the Government prescribed several elements themselves if the courts can have regard to them? Our whole argument is that the courts can have regard to factors they want to have regard to. The impetus behind Amendments 85 and 88 was that the Government were being partial and pushing in a certain direction for the three elements they will allow the courts to consider—the argument for adding the extra elements, the consequences of disturbing the settled understanding of the law and the importance of legal certainty, clarity and predictability—and to try to re-establish the balance that the authors of the amendments felt was lacking.

If I may say so, I find the Minister’s reply so far extremely puzzling. He has, correctly, given a paean of praise to our courts and the common law, saying that they have perfected the art of creating this mosaic—

Lord Harlech Portrait Lord Harlech (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I ask the noble Baroness to put her question to the Minister.