To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Extradition: USA
Wednesday 11th March 2020

Asked by: Baroness Wheatcroft (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask Her Majesty's Government how many people have been extradited to the United States under the UK–US extradition treaty of 2003.

Answered by Baroness Williams of Trafford - Captain of the Honourable Corps of Gentlemen-at-Arms (HM Household) (Chief Whip, House of Lords)

The Extradition Treaty between the UK and the US came into force on 26 April 2007. Since that date 133 people have been extradited to the US. Of those, nine were extradited for terrorism offences and 57 were extradited for finance-related charges, including wire fraud. The following offences have been included in this broad category of criminality:

  • Wire Fraud
  • Bribery
  • Fraud
  • Conspiracy to Defraud
  • Tax Evasion / Offences
  • Securities Fraud
  • Money Laundering
  • Computer Fraud
  • Mail fraud

Information on plea bargaining is not centrally recorded by the Home Office.

All figures are from local management information and have not been quality assured to the level of published National Statistics. As such they should be treated as provisional and therefore subject to change. The figures do not include Scotland, which deals with its own extradition cases.


Written Question
Extradition: USA
Wednesday 11th March 2020

Asked by: Baroness Wheatcroft (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask Her Majesty's Government how many people extradited to the United States under the UK–US extradition treaty of 2003 were accused of (1) offences related to terrorism, and (2) finance-related charges, including wire fraud.

Answered by Baroness Williams of Trafford - Captain of the Honourable Corps of Gentlemen-at-Arms (HM Household) (Chief Whip, House of Lords)

The Extradition Treaty between the UK and the US came into force on 26 April 2007. Since that date 133 people have been extradited to the US. Of those, nine were extradited for terrorism offences and 57 were extradited for finance-related charges, including wire fraud. The following offences have been included in this broad category of criminality:

  • Wire Fraud
  • Bribery
  • Fraud
  • Conspiracy to Defraud
  • Tax Evasion / Offences
  • Securities Fraud
  • Money Laundering
  • Computer Fraud
  • Mail fraud

Information on plea bargaining is not centrally recorded by the Home Office.

All figures are from local management information and have not been quality assured to the level of published National Statistics. As such they should be treated as provisional and therefore subject to change. The figures do not include Scotland, which deals with its own extradition cases.


Written Question
Extradition: USA
Wednesday 11th March 2020

Asked by: Baroness Wheatcroft (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask Her Majesty's Government how many of those extradited under the UK–US extradition treaty of 2003 entered a plea bargain in the US judicial system.

Answered by Baroness Williams of Trafford - Captain of the Honourable Corps of Gentlemen-at-Arms (HM Household) (Chief Whip, House of Lords)

The Extradition Treaty between the UK and the US came into force on 26 April 2007. Since that date 133 people have been extradited to the US. Of those, nine were extradited for terrorism offences and 57 were extradited for finance-related charges, including wire fraud. The following offences have been included in this broad category of criminality:

  • Wire Fraud
  • Bribery
  • Fraud
  • Conspiracy to Defraud
  • Tax Evasion / Offences
  • Securities Fraud
  • Money Laundering
  • Computer Fraud
  • Mail fraud

Information on plea bargaining is not centrally recorded by the Home Office.

All figures are from local management information and have not been quality assured to the level of published National Statistics. As such they should be treated as provisional and therefore subject to change. The figures do not include Scotland, which deals with its own extradition cases.