All 3 Debates between Lord Campbell-Savours and Baroness Garden of Frognal

Broadband: 4G Mobile

Debate between Lord Campbell-Savours and Baroness Garden of Frognal
Thursday 21st June 2012

(11 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes, indeed, my Lords. This is one of the counterarguments: that we really want this to roll out as rapidly as possible. In many other countries this has already happened. Our advantage is that we have been taking lessons particularly from Sweden, which was in the forefront of the rollout, in where the difficulties occurred and where we might be able to fast-track our system.

Lord Campbell-Savours Portrait Lord Campbell-Savours
- Hansard - -

My Lords, what does “close to a mast” mean?

Telecommunications: Mobile Phone Services

Debate between Lord Campbell-Savours and Baroness Garden of Frognal
Monday 18th June 2012

(11 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The issues around e-mail run into the same sort of practicalities as e-mail for mobile. We hope that, as these technologies advance, so the provision for e-mail will become easier as well. Once again, I fully acknowledge my noble friend’s point.

Lord Campbell-Savours Portrait Lord Campbell-Savours
- Hansard - -

Are we not going a bit soft on some of these operators? They make vast profits, but there are large parts of the country, including large parts of Cumbria, where there is no signal at all. Companies such as Vodafone have got away with it for decades, and the Government should act.

Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I do not think the Government are that relaxed. The noble Lord’s point is, of course, absolutely right, but there has to be a balance. Often, putting up the structures to support the sort of reception that he is looking for does not get planning permission in the first place and is commercially expensive when taking into account the handful of people who would benefit. Obviously, all these factors will be taken into consideration when the new generation— 4G—comes on stream, so that communication becomes more possible for more parts of the country.

Health: Obesity

Debate between Lord Campbell-Savours and Baroness Garden of Frognal
Monday 4th April 2011

(13 years, 1 month ago)

Grand Committee
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Campbell-Savours Portrait Lord Campbell-Savours
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I would like to intervene briefly to express some marginally politically incorrect sentiments, because I share concerns expressed by Members of the Committee about the scale of the problem of obesity nationally, which I think is huge.

Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Perhaps the noble Lord will forgive me, but we were not notified that he had his name on the speaking list.

Lord Campbell-Savours Portrait Lord Campbell-Savours
- Hansard - -

I did not know that there was a speaking list.

Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am afraid that there is; this is a timed debate. However, as one of the speakers has scratched, the noble Lord can speak for four minutes in the gap.

Lord Campbell-Savours Portrait Lord Campbell-Savours
- Hansard - -

I intend to intervene only briefly. I support the noble Lord, Lord McColl, and congratulate him on introducing this debate. His speech is worthy of passing around our friends and colleagues because it would have made a very good after-dinner speech. Although it was amusing, it dealt with an extremely serious subject.

My noble friend Lord Patel raised the issue of calorific information on food products sold in stores and particularly in restaurants. The other week I went into a Harvester restaurant which I had never been into before. I noticed that every item on the menu had its calorific content in bold lettering, so much so that I cannot believe that people who eat in those restaurants are not aware of and do not take into account the calorific content when they order their food. I am told that in parts of the world, particularly in America, the authorities in some cities insist on calorific information being provided on all menus in restaurants.

I wonder why we cannot do something similar here in the United Kingdom. I know that the Government are not over-wedded to the principle of too much regulation, but when so much is at stake arising out of problems of obesity and their consequences for health service expenditure, why can we not grasp the nettle in this area and introduce a regulatory framework for food manufacturers whereby the general public really do have to sit down and consider what they eat daily? If we were to do that, I believe that it would certainly have some consequence for obesity.

I return to being slightly politically incorrect. There is another problem as well. Families are often simply not prepared to raise the issue internally. There is an embarrassment about fatness. People just do not want to talk about it. Even among one’s colleagues, here or anywhere, we do not talk about whether people are fat or thin. We have to get over that because a huge problem is developing, in part due to an element of political incorrectness which is reflected in how the media and the industry treat the subject.

I am sorry if I did not comply completely with the rules. Having come from the Commons, and as I normally speak only at Report, in Committee and on Third Reading, I am not used to listings during debates.