Pension Schemes Bill Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateLord Katz
Main Page: Lord Katz (Labour - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord Katz's debates with the Department for Work and Pensions
(1 day, 14 hours ago)
Lords ChamberOkay. This demonstrates the clear fact that I am still suffering from my cold, which is so bad that it kept me from attending the second day of Report.
There is an important issue that needs to be highlighted, and that is addressed in Amendment 165. I want to say a word on behalf of the members of a number of different schemes—NatWest is one, but there are others—who feel aggrieved because they were not properly informed of their rights under their scheme. Their major complaint is that when they reach state pension age, they suffer a diminution in their benefits. These rules were introduced in all good faith, and I participated in such negotiations myself, but it is the failure of the employer to ensure adequate information for members that has led to the complaint.
Do I have a different grouping from everyone else? I am speaking to Amendment 165, which is in the first group—is that correct?
Okay; good. As I say, I am still suffering from my cold, and I hope the House will indulge me. But I think it is important to make the point on those members’ behalf.