All 1 Debates between Lord Rogan and Lord Laming

All-Party Parliamentary Groups

Debate between Lord Rogan and Lord Laming
Wednesday 11th November 2015

(8 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Rogan Portrait Lord Rogan (UUP)
- Hansard - -

I wish to ask the Question standing in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Empey, on the Order Paper.

Lord Laming Portrait The Chairman of Committees (Lord Laming) (Non-Afl)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, Members of this House attach great importance to the work of APPGs. Recently, there have been two extensive reviews into the rules on all-party groups; following the second review in May 2014, the House of Commons resolved that each group must have an MP who is the chair and registered contact. That MP is responsible for ensuring compliance with the rules. Members of this House may of course be co-chair of a group and may chair meetings, but that does not affect the accountability of the registered MP.

Lord Rogan Portrait Lord Rogan
- Hansard - -

I thank the Chairman of Committees for that reply. However, given that this House has a reputation for its Members having considerable expertise in a wide range of pursuits and disciplines, what is the rationale for prohibiting your Lordships from chairing non-statutory lobby interest groups? Surely, the Chairman of Committees would agree that this sends a somewhat negative signal to the wider community and places us in a somewhat second-class position, regardless of the qualifications that we may have for the position.

Lord Laming Portrait The Chairman of Committees
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord for his question. Members will know that the first resolution on APPGs was in 1985 in the Commons, and the Commons has always been in the lead. There have been concerns about the growth of APPGs, their funding and a number of other matters with which Members are familiar. Suffice it to say, it was decided that it was very important to have a clear line of accountability to the House of Commons Commissioner for Standards. Therefore, MPs are required to be registered with the Commons registrar. There was nothing malevolent about that; it in no way minimises the contribution that Members of this House make to APPGs.