Youth Unemployment

Lord Rook Excerpts

Tuesday 24th March 2026 Lords Chamber

[Baroness Sherlock (Lab)]

My Lords, although it may not be my responsibility, it is the Government’s responsibility, and I take responsibility for the failure to respond. I apologise on behalf of my department, and I will look into what has happened. The department is aware of the report, and I am certainly very grateful for it. I often think that we do not make enough use of the excellent reports that come out of this House, and this Government are determined to use all evidence, including the work that is already there.

We have not set specific targets, but we have set very clear measurements of the impact of what we do—that is how we will measure ourselves and hold ourselves to account. Our trailblazers are looking at localised approaches to support, including sharing information on and tracking NEET young people, which was picked up in the report. I am very happy to look at that and will take the noble Lord’s message back to my department.

[Lord Rook (Lab)]

My Lords, I declare an interest as a father of two young adults—an interest I have in common with people across these Houses and homes across the country, as well as a desire to see them get into work. First, will this offer arise only for those already on benefits? Secondly, while we all hope that our children will find a first job, we also hope that they will find themselves in a future of sustainable work. How might this package enable young people to find that kind of flourishing future, as well as that first step into the workplace?

[Baroness Sherlock (Lab)]

On the first question, we are not working only with those who are on benefits. Some of the specific elements of the programme are for those who are on universal credit, either for six months or 18 months, and looking for work. However, we are really concerned about those young people who are not in education, employment or training, who are not appearing in the benefits system and who are not on the radar—they are sometimes called “hidden NEETs”. They may not be in the system and may be living with parents or elsewhere—none the less, they are out there. The youth guarantee is about reaching all NEETs, including those not on benefits. That was a key element of the youth guarantee trailblazers, backed by £90 million-worth of funding, which sought to find innovative ways to reach young people outside the benefits system whom we do not already have on our radar. Mayoral strategic authorities are looking into ways that work in their locality. We are trying to make sure that we reach those people too.

The point about the future is very important: nobody wants to be the person who takes an apprenticeship in gas lights just at the point when electricity comes to town. We need to find a way to make sure that young people go into jobs with a future. While one can never be sure, we are developing new apprenticeship units that are aligned specifically with the priorities of the industrial strategy, and we hope that that will help. That includes AI, construction and engineering, and we will develop future units as it goes forward by going with the grain—to echo my noble friend Lord Reid’s comment—of where the economy is going and what employers need. We have to create a future for young people.

Youth Unemployment

Lord Rook Excerpts

Thursday 11th September 2025 Lords Chamber

[Lord Leigh of Hurley (Con)]

My Lords—

[Lord Rook (Lab)]

My Lords—

[Captain of the Honourable Corps of Gentlemen-at-Arms and Chief Whip (Lord Kennedy of Southwark) (Lab Co-op)]

We will hear from the Lib Dem Benches next.

Universal Credit Bill

Lord Rook Excerpts

2nd reading & Committee negatived & 3rd reading
Tuesday 22nd July 2025 Lords Chamber

[Lord Rook (Lab)]

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend the Minister for her introduction and to noble Lords for what has already been a broad discussion. I look forward to hearing the maiden speech of the noble Baroness, Lady Shawcross-Wolfson, and to her contribution to your Lordships’ House in the days to come. I also look forward to the valedictory speech of the noble Baroness, Lady Bryan, and wish her all the best for the future.

A long time ago, in a land not so far away, I worked for the Salvation Army as a youth worker. In those distant times, there was a new and unhappy category of young person emerging in our communities. While not entirely the stuff of fantasy or fiction, the prospect of sustainable employment for those young people, who we called NEETs, was not that great. Where working life was concerned, those young adults who were not in education, employment or training needed their Government and communities to help them on their way.

As was the case in 2009, we now have almost 1 million 16 to 24 year-olds who are not in education, employment or training. I welcome the efforts in the Bill to reduce those numbers by increasing the incentive and support provided. This will help to reduce long-term benefit dependency, motivate young people to find their place in the workplace and enable those who currently feel left out to seek a way back in.

In 2009, my honourable friend, the right honourable Sir Stephen Timms, now Minister of State for DWP in the other place, was the architect of the future jobs fund. As a youth worker, I saw first-hand how this programme provided the aspiration and activation that so many young adults needed to step up on to the first rung of the career ladder. The Bill provides young people with similar prospects for support, training and opportunity.

As with other legislation, I am keen that we prioritise young people. After all, this generation has been disproportionately affected by the Covid pandemic and other societal challenges. While the current economic outlook clearly restricts the resources available to the Government, the department’s investment of £2.2 billion over the next four years to increase work, health and skills support for all those struggling to find suitable employment is more than welcome.

Once a youth worker, always a youth worker. While my youth work skills are certainly less in demand here in your Lordships’ House, my heart still goes out to those young people struggling to make their way in our country today.

Of all the challenges we face, the current mental health epidemic among young people is among the most significant and urgently demands the attention of government as a whole. For a significant number of those not in education, employment or training, anxiety, depression and other complex conditions can provide a seemingly insurmountable barrier to employment.

With this in mind, I am particularly heartened by the right to try guarantee. This will make it easier for those who are out of work to make a go of things in the workplace. Where support for young adults is concerned, I hope that today’s legislation will be a good start and not the whole story. There is much that needs to be done, for their sake and ours. I am grateful for the tireless work of my noble friend the Minister, Lady Sherlock, and stand to support the Bill today. Given his previous success in this area, I am thankful that Sir Stephen Timms has been tasked with bringing his unique expertise to the upcoming Timms review. I hope that there will be more creative and impactful policy to come and remain keen to see other institutions take the Government’s lead and invest in our young adults.

At the Salvation Army, I saw how a large employer could grasp a government policy such as the future jobs fund to give disadvantaged young people a much-needed hand up and thus reduce the requirements for future handouts. As the Government seek to quicken the path of young adults into future jobs through the Bill, I hope that other institutions will redouble their efforts to give youth a chance and provide future generations with a brighter future.

Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill

Lord Rook Excerpts

2nd reading
Thursday 15th May 2025 Lords Chamber

[Lord Rook (Lab)]

My Lords, I support the Bill and thank my noble friend Lady Anderson for her opening remarks. I am grateful also to other noble Lords for the sizeable support for the urgency of our situation and the aspirations of the measures in the Bill. I also look forward to the maiden speech of the noble Baroness, Lady Spielman, in just a few moments.

A hero of mine once pointed out to me that all financial documents are moral documents, and all financial policies are moral policies. While the measures that this Bill seeks to address are clearly fiscal, the motivations are rightly and justly moral. In the time available I will limit my remarks to the first part of the legislation.

I spent much of the Covid pandemic working with charities and churches, faith communities and local community groups, supporting the most vulnerable members of our community. While these organisations spent huge amounts of time and money to ensure that neighbours had food and pharmaceuticals, and worked to reduce loneliness and isolation and increase take-up of the Covid vaccines—among other heroic acts of service—other, unscrupulous actors took every opportunity to pick the public pocket, fraudulently redirecting essential emergency funding, purposed for the most vulnerable, into their own get-rich-quick scheme.

In a tragic turn, some of the same charities and community groups that saved lives in the pandemic have not themselves survived the Covid recovery. While these groups faced increased costs and diminishing donations, even greater demand for their services and near devastating cuts in government funding, the vast majority of those who defrauded the Government continue to enjoy the benefit of their ill-gotten gains, collectively to the tune of almost £10 billion.

Although, according to the NAO, more than £4 billion was lost through fraud and error through the Bounce Back Loan Scheme, and almost the same amount through the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, for many charities bouncing back has been altogether more difficult, and in some cases, impossible. In the longer term, many former employees in voluntary sector and civil society organisations have not retained their jobs and have been subject to redundancy. More worrying still, as the noble Baroness, Lady Finn, remarked, a criminal culture of fraud has been cultivated during and since those Covid years. The National Audit Office cites that this type of fraudulent activity has only grown in the four years since, and without action, it will clearly continue to do so for some time.

Decisive action is clearly needed, and the measures outlined in the Bill are precisely what is needed. I agree wholeheartedly with my noble friend Lady Anderson when she says that this legislation is both “tough and fair”.

The measures in the Bill are timely and necessary. They will enable the Cabinet Office to deal more effectively with cases of fraud and error outside of the benefits and tax systems. I agree with the noble Baroness, Lady Alexander, that it makes a great deal of sense to give these powers to the Cabinet Office, and to develop the necessary expertise to deliver them. These powers and processes, readily available to certain other government departments, will provide the Cabinet Office and Public Sector Fraud Authority with the capacity they need to pursue those who perpetrated Covid fraud, along with other instances in the future.

I hope that, at a time when all noble Lords are anxious to protect the public purse, this legislation offers a route towards effective action and an efficient means of redress. By providing the Cabinet Office and the PSFA with the necessary powers for information-gathering, dissemination of information, search and seizure and the collection of communications data, we will enable the Government rightly and fairly to identify where significant fraud has taken or is taking place.

By providing the rights and approving the methods by which to recover these moneys lost to fraudsters, and by providing a framework for Ministers to impose civil penalties, we empower the Government to take action to recoup losses and ensure that justice is done. Furthermore, as has already been pointed out, if banks are using ever more sophisticated digital resources and capabilities to reduce the painful impact of fraud on individual members of the public, it follows that government should work with banks to reduce the negative impact of fraud on the public more broadly.

By prolonging the timeframe within which Covid fraud can be investigated and the perpetrators dealt with, we can maximise the moneys returned to the public purse, bring to book those who continue to benefit from a crime against their country and their neighbours, and send a clear message that a toxic culture among some, whereby fraud is considered a lesser crime, will not be tolerated—without breaking bones or spilling blood, as the noble and learned Lord just said. As I understand it, only £1.5 billion of the Covid fraud moneys has so far been recovered, which means that there is a lot more to be done and a lot more time is needed.

Finally, as already stated, these measures are tough and fair. The Government’s insistence on oversight and safeguarding requirements is welcome and necessary. It clearly makes sense to use legislation such as the Police and Criminal Evidence Act and models of investigation and action that are established in law and already effective in practice. The proposal to use the HMICFRS as a specialist inspectorate, along with the appointment of an independent chair and oversight team in the PSFA, should provide proper oversight to ensure that the Bill is implemented effectively and fairly.

At a time when millions rely on food banks and wider social support from the kind of charities and civil society organisations that we have mentioned earlier—and which served so faithfully through the pandemic—every penny stolen from the Government is a penny that cannot be used to help the most disadvantaged to escape poverty. Those who have defrauded the public purse are not simply stealing from the Government’s bank account; they are stealing from their neighbours, from those most in need, from those who are more deserving of our support and most in need of our care. This Bill seeks redress at least some of the damage done by those who have all too easily defrauded the public in years gone by; puts vital measures in place to confront a worrisome criminal culture which has become all too prevalent in our country; and provides a means by which to deter and deal with such behaviour in future.

With this, we return to the start. Financial documents are moral documents, and financial policies are moral policies. As noble Lords together, I hope that we will provide moral leadership in passing this Bill. I commend it to the House.