@StripperFundASM Different person
Neil Ferguson and his models do not have a good track record, on the pandemic or anything else: https://t.co/iQOsFlFdDV This is the same Professor Ferguson who told us in the 1990s that millions might die of mad-cow disease. The correct number was 178. https://t.co/2MLwofFDBj
Amazon (US): https://t.co/ZetDkjA8fx Barnes & Noble: https://t.co/JhV0q3fHSA Other Retailers (US): https://t.co/F2kDCddcsT Independent Bookshops (US): https://t.co/mBkVpbE384
If you haven't picked it up yet and would like to do so (or purchase it as a gift), here it is from... Amazon (UK): https://t.co/v0o5wElkOP Other Retailers (UK): https://t.co/pMLIBP3w4g Independent Sellers (UK): https://t.co/BENNUFd64k
“This has been a masterclass in how the scientific community can be very conflicted, how science cannot be embodied by one person or even a group of people... It’s not something where a pandemic happens and only virologists can have the answer.” well said, @Ayjchan. https://t.co/ucXfWPJCnc
"Aaron Bell said the memorandum declaring Mr Daszak’s interests had been ‘too little too late." https://t.co/CGavlUuzbL
"...Yet despite the close link, it took 16 months for the Lancet to publish a memo setting out Mr Daszak’s conflicts of interest." https://t.co/CGavlUuzbL
One more to go. Who wants to be review 100? https://t.co/ZetDkjA8fx
"The letter was authored by Peter Daszak, the head of EcoHealth alliance, who had worked closely with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) engineering bat coronaviruses..." https://t.co/CGavlUuzbL
"During the session, the editor of the Lancet, Richard Horton, was also criticised over a letter published by the journal in 2020 which dismissed the lab leak theory as a ‘conspiracy theory’ and effectively shut down the debate into the lab leak theory." https://t.co/CGavlUuzbL