Debates between Alex Cunningham and Jane Ellison during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Alex Cunningham and Jane Ellison
Tuesday 17th January 2017

(7 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Alex Cunningham Portrait Alex Cunningham (Stockton North) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

7. What assessment he has made of the potential effect of losing access to the single market on the chemical industry and the wider economy.

Jane Ellison Portrait The Financial Secretary to the Treasury (Jane Ellison)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Government absolutely recognise the significant contritibution that the chemicals industry makes to the UK economy, and of course the complex supply chains between the UK and the EU. The hon. Gentleman will have heard the Chancellor’s words just now about the importance we attach to getting the best possible market access, and the Prime Minister is talking about that this morning. We are looking at a comprehensive range of analysis to inform our position as we go into those negotiations but, as the Prime Minister is laying out, clarity and certainty are one of the industry’s big asks.

Alex Cunningham Portrait Alex Cunningham
- Hansard - -

The Chemical Industries Association’s Brexit manifesto shows how the chemical industry could help to sustain and enhance the UK as a location for future investment in jobs while playing a leading part in addressing global environmental challenges. Has the Minister read the manifesto? What is she doing to reassure the chemical industry that its very specific needs are at the forefront of her mind as the Government develop their strategy?

Jane Ellison Portrait Jane Ellison
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Rather than just reading the manifesto, Ministers have actually been meeting the chemical industry. The Under-Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, my hon. Friend the Member for Worcester (Mr Walker), met the Chemical Industries Association on 17 November. All these issues were explored in some detail and a good, productive conversation was had.