All 1 Debates between Andy McDonald and Robert Jenrick

Tue 11th Jul 2023
Illegal Migration Bill
Commons Chamber

Consideration of Lords amendments

Illegal Migration Bill

Debate between Andy McDonald and Robert Jenrick
Robert Jenrick Portrait Robert Jenrick
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will come back to that issue later in my remarks, but let me be clear, if further reassurance is required, that the Government take our international law obligations extremely seriously. We believe that all the matters outlined in the Bill are within our international legal obligations, and should the Bill or any aspect of it be legally challenged, we will contest that vigorously to defend the position we have set out.

I point the hon. Gentleman to one important element of the recent judgment in the Court of Appeal, which was on this question: if a state such as the United Kingdom used another state and entered into a partnership, such as we have with Rwanda, for the purposes of asylum, would that be compatible with the refugee convention? I point out that all three judges agreed that that was compatible with the refugee convention. On arguably the central international law issue at stake, the Court of Appeal was clear that the Government’s approach is compatible with international law.

Andy McDonald Portrait Andy McDonald (Middlesbrough) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

The Minister has made that commitment about the refugee convention, but Lords amendment 1 says that the Bill should be read so as not to conflict with the European convention on human rights, the refugee convention and the conventions on statelessness, the rights of the child and anti-trafficking. Why are the Government so opposed to that clarification and that clear statement on the face of the Bill, if we are the beacon and an adherent to international obligations and law?

Robert Jenrick Portrait Robert Jenrick
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is not normal practice to state that on the face of the Bill. It goes without saying that the Government obey our international obligations, as we do with all pieces of legislation.