All 2 Debates between Anna Soubry and Mike Penning

Wed 5th Sep 2018
Voyeurism (Offences) (No. 2) Bill
Commons Chamber

3rd reading: House of Commons & Report stage: House of Commons

Northern Ireland (Executive Formation and Exercise of Functions) Bill

Debate between Anna Soubry and Mike Penning
Mike Penning Portrait Sir Mike Penning
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I completely agree with the hon. Lady. Sinn Féin see their people who were doing those atrocities as combatants. They were part of their army; that is why they called them what they did. But they do not look at our veterans in the same way; actually, I think they look at them with derision. I served with Catholics from Belfast in the Army, and they could not go home—certainly, if they did, they could not tell anyone what they were doing. When I was in basic training, many of them stayed with me, with us, because they felt that they could not go back, even though they were Unionists and they wanted to serve in the British Army. Many people from the south served in the British Army. We have police officers from the Republic now who are serving in the police force in Northern Ireland. That is the sort of thing we had, but we still do not have peace.

What peace do we have in Northern Ireland? We have touched on this, and on the murders of prison officers. When I was the Minister there, David Black was shot with a weapon that most people in Northern Ireland know was an AK47, from the Gaddafi era, that was supposed to have been placed out of use and out of everything. He was shot on the M1 going to work. What sort of peace is that?

Anna Soubry Portrait Anna Soubry
- Hansard - -

My right hon. Friend makes a powerful point about the pursuit of people who should clearly not be pursued as they have been through a process that has long been done with. Does he agree that that matter should actually be being determined by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland? It is a clear and blatant abuse of process that old criminal lawyers will understand. Does he also agree that it is not good enough that the covenant has not been fully extended through the entirety of Northern Ireland?

Mike Penning Portrait Sir Mike Penning
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Perhaps unusually, I agree with my right hon. Friend on nearly everything she says apart from her point about the Attorney General. British soldiers who were there to keep the peace—that is what I was sent to do—were sent by the British Government and so, in my opinion, the only Attorney General who should look at it is the Attorney General here. We were sent there not by Northern Ireland Ministers or Attorney Generals, but by those who were here. My Prime Minister at the time sent the troops. I went in ’74; there were lots before me and lots after us. It cannot be right—it cannot—that this Bill ignores what was given by so many to protect the Province.

Voyeurism (Offences) (No. 2) Bill

Debate between Anna Soubry and Mike Penning
3rd reading: House of Commons & Report stage: House of Commons
Wednesday 5th September 2018

(5 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Voyeurism (Offences) Act 2019 View all Voyeurism (Offences) Act 2019 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: Consideration of Bill Amendments as at 5 September 2018 - (5 Sep 2018)
Anna Soubry Portrait Anna Soubry
- Hansard - -

Will the hon. Lady give way?

Stella Creasy Portrait Stella Creasy
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will happily give way to a Nottingham MP and then to the right hon. Gentleman, but then I really must make some progress, because I am conscious that other Members want to speak.