Education Technology: Oak National Academy Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Education

Education Technology: Oak National Academy

Baroness Blower Excerpts
Monday 7th November 2022

(1 year, 6 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Barran Portrait Baroness Barran (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have to say it sticks in my throat to have private equity investors who are responsible for considerable distortions in the children’s home market lecturing the Government on distortions in the edtech market. More importantly, the Government are not distorting the curriculum. The Government are striving—I know that the noble Lord knows that this is true—to have the best curriculum for children. We know that teachers will make the best judgment on what curriculum their students need. That is why, apart from the curriculum from Oak’s own partners, which will be on the platform, it will also showcase more than 80 other curriculum models for providers so that teachers can make those comparisons.

Baroness Blower Portrait Baroness Blower (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My Lords, however good the materials from the Oak Academy may be, I was very pleased to hear what the Minister said about other materials. I would like her to reassure the House that there is no intention, and never will be, that Oak Academy materials will become mandatory in schools, or even be perceived as required on the basis of support for those materials from Ofsted, to the exclusion of other curriculum materials and pedagogical style.

Baroness Barran Portrait Baroness Barran (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am delighted to be able to reassure the noble Baroness that Oak will never be mandated; it is an optional resource for teachers.