Brexit: Statutory Instruments Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateBaroness Neville-Rolfe
Main Page: Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Baroness Neville-Rolfe's debates with the Department for Exiting the European Union
(6 years, 9 months ago)
Lords Chamber Lord Callanan
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord Callanan 
        
    
        
    
        The organisation of business in the House is a matter for my noble friend the Chief Whip and for the usual channels. I am sure they will, as they always do, work collaboratively and co-operatively to ensure there is sufficient time for the proper scrutiny of all the appropriate legislation.
 Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Con)
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Con) 
        
    
        
    
        I have taken a lot of interest in the SI process and most of these SIs are needed, whether we have a deal or not, to bring EU law into UK law. We should support that process whatever our views in today’s bigger debate.
 Lord Callanan
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord Callanan 
        
    
        
    
        I thank my noble friend for her constructive comments. The reality is that we are leaving the European Union. That decision was made by the referendum and by Parliament. We happen to believe that we should do it with a functioning statute book.