Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Baroness O'Cathain

Main Page: Baroness O'Cathain (Conservative - Life peer)

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Baroness O'Cathain Excerpts
Thursday 6th November 2014

(9 years, 6 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Popat Portrait Lord Popat
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, of course the Government will address them. The same argument always comes out when a new form of transport is developed—as it did with trains, cars and aeroplanes. It comes down to two questions. First, do the benefits of the new industry, economic and otherwise, outweigh the possible negatives as regards safety, security and privacy? Secondly, are we confident that we are regulating enough to ensure safety but not regulating too much so that we harm the new industry, which is very lucrative?

Baroness O'Cathain Portrait Baroness O'Cathain (Con)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, as the noble Lord, Lord Clinton-Davis, knows, the European Union Select Committee is currently doing a study on the situation as regards drones. Only yesterday and the day before we took evidence on this in Brussels from various people; and we have already taken evidence from the CAA and BALPA. The noble Lord is right to say that the situation is fast developing. I am sorry—I am not asking a question on that, I just want to put this in context. What is being done at the moment is to safeguard Britain’s position on safety regulation and pilot involvement, and I think that it is slightly too early to make any statement.

Lord Popat Portrait Lord Popat
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I agree with my noble friend and pay tribute to the good work she does in chairing that important committee. I believe that its report is due in January. Once we get that report—which will address things such as safety, control, security, insurance and so—we should be able to analyse and establish what further regulation or control we need to bring in to make this industry safer.