Annual Energy Statement Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Barry Gardiner

Main Page: Barry Gardiner (Labour - Brent North)

Annual Energy Statement

Barry Gardiner Excerpts
Tuesday 27th July 2010

(13 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Chris Huhne Portrait Chris Huhne
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I can confirm to my hon. Friend that below 50 MW the decision is for the local planning authority. However, I urge him not to fall into the easy trap of assuming that the only reason for building onshore wind turbines is for subsidy. The recent study on costs that the Department has had from Mott MacDonald shows that there has been a dramatic reduction in the cost of onshore wind. The result is that it is competitive in a free market with other sources of energy.

Barry Gardiner Portrait Barry Gardiner (Brent North) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Thirty per cent. of the UK’s energy supply will be going off stream between 2017 and 2025 as nuclear power stations are decommissioned. Is it good enough for the Secretary of State to say that the private sector may supply new nuclear facilities? Surely he has to come up with a plan now to replace that 30% of energy and tell the House where it is going to come from.

Chris Huhne Portrait Chris Huhne
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman and I have already had this debate, which is a bit like dancing on the head of a pin. The reality is that the Government’s job is to set a clear framework that will deliver the energy investment that we need to deal with the problem that the hon. Gentleman rightly raises. I believe that the statement is a first step towards doing that. We will have a clear amount of new energy infrastructure investment. I merely point out that it is really no part of the business of government to micro-manage decisions that should properly be left to the marketplace and the private sector.