Future Army 2020 Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Future Army 2020

Bob Russell Excerpts
Thursday 6th March 2014

(10 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom Portrait Mr Arbuthnot
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

In answer to the hon. Gentleman’s final question, I would say that we may be too late for that, because the recruitment notices have probably already been delivered. However, it is worrying that the 82,500 figure does not appear to have been subjected to any tests or experiments to establish whether it adequately addressed the threats that the country faces. As I said in my brief statement, I think it should have been a reiterative process. Obviously, there is a financial envelope within which we all have to work. Whether that is large enough rather depends on the threats we face.

Bob Russell Portrait Sir Bob Russell (Colchester) (LD)
- Hansard - -

I would like to place on record my appreciation of the right hon. Gentleman, who steps down as Chairman of the Defence Committee shortly. Does he agree that as the final five or six years of this decade unfold, if circumstances require it—notwithstanding the fact that civil servants determined the size of the Army—the Government should step in and increase recruitment so that the country gets the Army it should have?

Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom Portrait Mr Arbuthnot
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I do agree with the hon. Gentleman, who also does assiduous work on the Defence Committee. It should not be civil servants who determine the size of the Army; it should be this House that determines the size of the Army—it should be Ministers. Ministers are, of course, in overall control, but these are issues that should be discussed by the House of Commons on a regular basis and determined by Ministers.