Energy Company Licence Revocation Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Chris Ruane

Main Page: Chris Ruane (Labour - Vale of Clwyd)

Energy Company Licence Revocation

Chris Ruane Excerpts
Wednesday 3rd September 2014

(9 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Yasmin Qureshi Portrait Yasmin Qureshi
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the right hon. Gentleman for giving way.

Yasmin Qureshi Portrait Yasmin Qureshi
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank my hon. Friend for that. There seems to be a difference of opinion. We say that the grounds on which a licence can be revoked are very limited and technical. If I understand the Secretary of State correctly, he is saying that there are much wider grounds for revocation. Perhaps the way to resolve the dispute would be to take advice from expert legal counsel as to whether, legally speaking, our position or that of the Government is correct, because that way—

--- Later in debate ---
David T C Davies Portrait David T. C. Davies
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

No, I do not. I have a great deal of respect for what the hon. Gentleman says. I do not support the Government at all on this particular policy. I think it was a huge mistake—

Chris Ruane Portrait Chris Ruane
- Hansard - -

Minister, take note!

David T C Davies Portrait David T. C. Davies
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes, please do take note. People should not think I am saying anything now that I have not said before. Indeed, I more or less said it a few months ago at a meeting with the Global Warming Policy Foundation at which the hon. Member for Blackley and Broughton (Graham Stringer) was present. I am absolutely not going to hide my views on this.

Most Members are completely wrong on energy policy because they have all bought into the idea that we are going to suffer runaway global warming, and the reality is that that is not happening. We are being told to look at the evidence. The evidence is clear: there has been no increase in temperature since 1997. We are told that in the 1800s we started putting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, which is of course true, that carbon dioxide is a global warming gas, which is true, and that therefore CO2 has been responsible for the very small increase in temperature that has taken place since then. However, if one looks at the evidence, one can see that there has not been a straightforward rise in temperatures; they fell between 1940 and 1970. That proves that something else was affecting them. As we started to industrialise, we were coming out of a particularly cool period that climatologists call the little ice age, so there had to be some increase in warming anyway.

Since 1997, as I said, there has not been any increase in temperature. That proves beyond all doubt that something other than carbon dioxide is affecting the climate, and nobody can say what that is. Nobody has been able to tell me what it is, and I have had meetings with people at the Met Office and all sorts of other people. It is therefore foolish of us to levy on our industries all sorts of taxes and subsidies that are affecting manufacturing and pushing up prices for home owners, and then to try to put all the blame on to the big six energy companies, as we are doing now, using them as a kind of whipping boy for the sins of those of us who have bought into the big green theories.