All 1 Debates between Conor Burns and David Nuttall

Benefit Claimants Sanctions (Required Assessment) Bill

Debate between Conor Burns and David Nuttall
Friday 2nd December 2016

(7 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Conor Burns Portrait Conor Burns
- Hansard - -

I hear the hon. Lady and I take her point absolutely, but I am afraid she did rather give the game away early in her speech when she said that in her view we should not have a sanctions regime at all—[Interruption.] That is the perspective from which I will give way to my hon. Friend the Member for Bury North (Mr Nuttall).

David Nuttall Portrait Mr Nuttall
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for giving way. It has been suggested a couple of times this morning—and we need to put an end to it—that the NAO report states that the system costs money. Page 43 of the report, in figure 23, clearly states:

“The total costs and benefits to government of sanctions are unknown”.

The NAO does not come to a conclusion; it leaves the matter open. It is not saying that there is a cost. Does he agree that one cannot put a cost on how many millions and billions of pounds are saved by ensuring that everyone complies with the rules?

Conor Burns Portrait Conor Burns
- Hansard - -

I entirely agree. I do not think we can put a cost on the opportunity for work. Of course, it is this Government—through the policies of those on these Benches, both in coalition and now in majority Government—who have ensured the economic conditions that have led to our having more people in work than ever before in history.