Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Dennis Skinner

Main Page: Dennis Skinner (Labour - Bolsover)

Oral Answers to Questions

Dennis Skinner Excerpts
Thursday 3rd April 2014

(10 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I call Mr Philip Hollobone.

Dennis Skinner Portrait Mr Skinner
- Hansard - -

Following on from that—

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I always bear the hon. Gentleman in mind, but we will hear from Mr Hollobone first.

Ed Davey Portrait Mr Davey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend makes a good point. One aim of the retail market review put forward by Ofgem was to reduce the complexity and confusion in the amount of tariffs, which many people thought was a barrier to competition and switching—the previous Government refused to do this. But I do not think we can rest there, and one reason I have been so supportive of things such as collective switching and engaging with the third sector—Age Concern, Citizens Advice and National Energy Action—to develop the big energy saving network is to ensure that we are reaching out to those people who find switching, even when the tariffs are more simplified, a difficult process and a hassle. We are doing everything we can to make sure that the benefits of switching and competition can be enjoyed by all.

Dennis Skinner Portrait Mr Skinner
- Hansard - -

Yes, have your conversation with the man who is dealing with coal, because this is very important. The Secretary of State referred to lurching back to the ’70s, but this is about the fact that we are reaching the end of an era. There will be one pit left if this decision goes through and it is all about some money. An idea has been put forward from those on the Labour Front Bench regarding the pension fund, but another solution could also be used. Why is it that the oil companies are being encouraged to take tax breaks in order to exploit those narrow seams of oil which are uneconomic? We have more than 100 million tonnes of coal beneath our soil, so surely he could use the same sort of system, with the EU and anybody else, to stop the demise and the closure of the last three remaining pits.

Ed Davey Portrait Mr Davey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We are working tirelessly on this. We have to make sure that we get a solution that all parties can sign up to, that provides value for money and that will actually work. We are trying our best, but the hon. Gentleman should know that there are genuine economic and geological issues, and other difficulties, involved. My right hon. Friend the energy Minister is trying to resolve this, working with everybody involved.

--- Later in debate ---
Ed Davey Portrait Mr Davey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I strongly agree with my hon. Friend. We have seen a massive increase in renewable electricity under this Government and the pipeline for more renewable electricity has never been as healthy as it is today.

Dennis Skinner Portrait Mr Dennis Skinner (Bolsover) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

If we can get away from the green deal for a bit, we can talk about 1,300 jobs that are going to go in two of the last three pits in Britain—people who work in the blackness of a coal mine. I want to know the answer to a question that Ministers have been asked on three separate occasions: was there a proposal to use the money from the mineworkers’ pension fund—not the protection fund—in order to save these two pits? Was it raised with the EU? What is the answer? It is time the Government came clean.

Michael Fallon Portrait Michael Fallon
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Let me be very clear: these issues are being and have been discussed with the unions. I had discussions with the unions last week and we continue to discuss the proposals with the Commission. Any proposal for taxpayer support would have to show good value for money and it would have to be for a clearly defined period. We continue to discuss the proposals for a managed closure with all the parties involved.