Security Vetting Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Security Vetting

Ellie Chowns Excerpts
Monday 20th April 2026

(1 day, 11 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Keir Starmer Portrait The Prime Minister
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have accepted that that was my decision and I have apologised for it.

Ellie Chowns Portrait Dr Ellie Chowns (North Herefordshire) (Green)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

The Prime Minister says it is “staggering” and “unforgiveable” that he was not told about the vetting, but what is really staggering and unforgiveable is that he appointed Peter Mandelson before the vetting—that he appointed Peter Mandelson knowing about his friendship with the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. What is unforgiveable is that the Prime Minister was more concerned with pandering to Donald Trump than with standing with the victims and survivors. The Prime Minister has not accepted a simple “sorry” from his civil servant—he thinks that is inadequate. The country thinks that a simple “sorry” is inadequate from him. Will he take personal responsibility for his staggering and unforgiveable errors of judgment—and resign?

Keir Starmer Portrait The Prime Minister
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have set out to the House the facts of what happened in this particular case. I am staggered and I find it unbelievable that I was not given the information I should have been given.