BHS Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Field of Birkenhead

Main Page: Lord Field of Birkenhead (Crossbench - Life peer)
Monday 6th June 2016

(7 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Anna Soubry Portrait Anna Soubry
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I completely agree. If the reports are right, this is obviously very deeply concerning, and many lessons might well have to be learned. We await the conclusions of these various inquiries before deciding what further action needs to be taken. We will not hesitate to do that.

Lord Field of Birkenhead Portrait Frank Field (Birkenhead) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

I thank the Minister for her statement, and use my response to it to express the anger on both sides of the House at the threat to 11,000 jobs and 20,000 pensions. When the Minister goes back to her Department, will she consider blowing a whistle on the break-up of this great empire? Is she satisfied that a company that could be sold for a quid should now be broken up because somebody could not meet a timetable for £100 million-worth of working capital? Is she satisfied that the firm entrusted with dealing with the break-up will actually behave in the best interests of the whole network rather than perhaps sell off some assets rather cheaply to known figures in this terribly sorry saga?

Anna Soubry Portrait Anna Soubry
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have faith in the workings of the administrators. They are under strict duties and I expect them to comply with those duties. I know of no reason why they would not do so. I also pay tribute to the good work being done by the Insolvency Service. It takes these matters seriously, as do all Members on both sides of the House.

The right hon. Gentleman asked a number of questions, and I have no difficulty with that. I am more than happy to write to him with any answers that I can provide to all the questions he raised.