Conduct of the Right Hon. Member for Uxbridge and South Ruislip Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: HM Treasury

Conduct of the Right Hon. Member for Uxbridge and South Ruislip

Gary Sambrook Excerpts
Tuesday 30th November 2021

(2 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Anneliese Dodds Portrait Anneliese Dodds (Oxford East) (Lab/Co-op)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

A very happy St Andrew’s Day to all in the Chamber.

I take no particular pleasure in debating this motion, but it is, of course, a pleasure to follow the Paymaster General, the right hon. and learned Member for Northampton North (Michael Ellis) and the right hon. Member for Ross, Skye and Lochaber (Ian Blackford), who opened today’s debate. I have to say that I find it strange to see massed ranks of Conservatives in the Chamber for this debate, when they appeared desperate to flee the Chamber no fewer than two weeks ago for the debate on publishing Owen Paterson’s contracts.

Anneliese Dodds Portrait Anneliese Dodds
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

If the hon. Member is about to justify why he was not here for that debate, I look forward to hearing from him.

Gary Sambrook Portrait Gary Sambrook
- Hansard - -

Talking of massed ranks, where are all the Labour Members? I saw on Twitter yesterday a graphic that said Labour was back in business. I am not too sure what business, but it is not the business of this House. Is it not the case that the reason they are not here is that they have no plan, no vision and no credibility to run this country?

Anneliese Dodds Portrait Anneliese Dodds
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I regret that the hon. Member seems terribly confused. I am sorry about that. This is an SNP Opposition day debate. As I will go on to explain, sadly it is his Government who lack a plan and lack, in regard to this motion, the necessary competence and credibility against corruption. If he could answer on those subjects, I would be very grateful, because he was not in the Chamber for the debate on the contracts. He certainly did not speak in it. I suspect he was not willing to do so. Indeed, it seems easier for some to defend the indefensible than to stand up for transparency, probity and the public interest. All I can say is that I really hope, for the sake of Conservative Members in the Chamber, that those in charge of junior ministerial appointments are watching carefully.