Vector-borne Diseases Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Baroness Merron

Main Page: Baroness Merron (Labour - Life peer)
Thursday 14th December 2023

(5 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate
Lord Evans of Rainow Portrait Lord Evans of Rainow (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Government are doing exactly that and investing significantly into research. In terms of any private sector business that is looking into this, they should please contact me or the government department and we will work with them. If there is any research and development that we are not aware of, we are very keen to hear about it.

Baroness Merron Portrait Baroness Merron (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My Lords, the analysis in the UKSA report referred to by the right reverend Prelate uses a high-end global warming scenario to represent a worst-case situation without mitigation and adaptation. Could the Minister advise how government planning is based on other scenarios at different rates of climate change? How are the agreements at the recent COP 28, and previously, expected to affect the conditions in which vector-borne diseases proliferate?

Lord Evans of Rainow Portrait Lord Evans of Rainow (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

The short answer to that is that we cannot be sure. A noble Lord asked about London and the south-east: that is a worst-case scenario. It is predicted to increase in the second half of the 21st century. As I have said previously, we need to monitor it in 2023 and onwards. Certainly, the south of England is warmer than the north and north-west of England; we just need to monitor it. These are worst-case scenarios of these diseases coming into the country. It is right and proper that we monitor them, and that we monitor them at the ports of entry—but it is a worst-case scenario and it may or may not happen this century.