Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Graham P Jones

Main Page: Graham P Jones (Labour - Hyndburn)

Oral Answers to Questions

Graham P Jones Excerpts
Thursday 25th June 2015

(8 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Andrea Leadsom Portrait Andrea Leadsom
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman will appreciate that we are looking at all options for the production of new nuclear. As he will know, an arrangement has already been made for Hinkley Point C, and we are looking at the options for further nuclear projects.

Graham P Jones Portrait Graham Jones (Hyndburn) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Back in 2008, and in their manifesto, the Conservatives promised no nuclear subsidies on any account, yet the European Commission has granted a subsidy to the UK Government of £17.6 billion for Hinkley Point. How is it that we can subsidise nuclear to that extent yet the Government are cutting subsidies to renewable energy sources?

Andrea Leadsom Portrait Andrea Leadsom
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I think I have said a number of times that diverse sources of energy are vital for our energy security. Currently, 36% of our electricity comes from coal, and around 19% is from old nuclear, much of which will shut down in the next decade. It is vital that we look to new nuclear to provide the base energy supply to meet the bulk of our energy security needs. Other technologies are also vital for diverse sources of energy. That is the approach we are taking.

--- Later in debate ---
John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Last but not least, I call Graham Jones.

Graham P Jones Portrait Graham Jones (Hyndburn) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Fuel poverty in east Lancashire is linked to hard-to-treat cavities, and the Government’s changes to the energy company obligation cancelled a lot of programmes. There is a large stock of terraced houses in my constituency and that of my hon. Friend the Member for Blackburn (Kate Hollern). What policies are the Government going to introduce to deal with hard-to-treat cavities, after they effectively cancelled the previous programmes by reducing the subsidy?

Amber Rudd Portrait Amber Rudd
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I take issue with the hon. Gentleman’s description of us cancelling the previous programme. In fact, what we did was get the balance right to ensure that bill payers were not overburdened by the costs of ECO, while continuing to focus ECO on the most fuel-poor. That element was not changed. We recognise that cavity wall insulation and cavity walls in general are an important part of making homes more fuel-efficient. ECO carries on until 2017 and we will be coming forward with more suggestions before then.