Higher Education Funding Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Higher Education Funding

Greg Mulholland Excerpts
Wednesday 3rd November 2010

(13 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Willetts Portrait Mr Willetts
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes. On the estimates that we have done—and we are placing some of our figures in the Library, not least because of the request from the shadow Secretary of State—it is clear, contrary to the rather misleading report in The Guardian the other week, which in turn drew on some work by the Social Market Foundation, that as graduates go through each stage on the earnings scale, they will be expected to pay more.

Greg Mulholland Portrait Greg Mulholland (Leeds North West) (LD)
- Hansard - -

I accept and welcome the fact that this proposal is more progressive than the current system, but I cannot accept that it has to be tied to an increase in fees. That is something that I cannot and will not accept. Will the Minister acknowledge some perversities within the idea of increasing fees? First, increasing fees to £6,000 leads to the possibility that students going into lower-entry courses and institutions will subsidise those on higher-entry courses. Secondly—

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Order. The hon. Gentleman will resume his seat. I am sorry but this is the second—[Interruption]. Order. This is the second time that this has happened today. There are lots of Members trying to get in. I want to help the hon. Gentleman and other Members, but we cannot have twin-hatted questions. It will not do.