Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Bellingham

Main Page: Lord Bellingham (Conservative - Life peer)

Oral Answers to Questions

Lord Bellingham Excerpts
Thursday 4th September 2014

(9 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Matt Hancock Portrait Matthew Hancock
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

There are opportunities for solar, where appropriately sited, in many different places on roofs and on land. In fact, land can be combined with agricultural use and solar. One other advantage of solar is that it can effectively be masked from being seen from elsewhere because it is low-rise rather than high-rise. This has to be done sensitively. There is no point in destroying our green and pleasant land in order to save the global environment. We have to tackle security of supply and climate change in a way that also protects the local environment.

Lord Bellingham Portrait Mr Henry Bellingham (North West Norfolk) (Con)
- Hansard - -

4. What plans he has to change the subsidy regime for onshore wind farms; and if he will make a statement.

Matt Hancock Portrait The Minister for Business and Enterprise (Matthew Hancock)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

In future, instead of a fixed level of subsidy, onshore wind will have to bid for support through our new contracts for difference, which will be allocated competitively so that only the best-value projects are supported. The first allocation rounds open in October.

Lord Bellingham Portrait Mr Bellingham
- Hansard - -

Is the Minister aware that Norfolk hosts a large number of offshore wind arrays that command widespread public support, in stark contrast to most—not all—onshore wind farms, which can be very unpopular when they destroy beautiful landscapes? Further to his earlier reply, can he confirm that Norfolk will not have any more onshore wind farms imposed on it in the face of local opposition?

Matt Hancock Portrait Matthew Hancock
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

As I said, we have given more local control in the planning system, as well as changing the subsidy regime so that onshore wind would have to be competitive, for instance, against solar. As the costs of solar fall, it is increasingly able to compete for that subsidy. This is about getting the best possible value for money out of the subsidy but also ensuring that local people have a say in the planning system. I know some of the sites that my hon. Friend is talking about—indeed, I visited, or rather went past, one of the developments last month—so I know of the local concern in his constituency. We have to make sure that in future local people have more of a say, and we are doing that.