European Union (Croatian Accession and Irish Protocol) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

European Union (Croatian Accession and Irish Protocol) Bill

Ian C. Lucas Excerpts
Tuesday 27th November 2012

(11 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Emma Reynolds Portrait Emma Reynolds
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

There is no clear precedent with regard to the accession of new member states. I believe that such a provision goes against the accession treaty with Croatia that has been negotiated with the 26 other member states and our Government. An amendment of this kind would send us back to the start of negotiations. All 16 member states that have already approved the treaty, and we and the remaining member states, would have to go back to the drawing board, along with Croatia, yet again to reopen what has been a very long and arduous process—a thorough process, and rightly so—for Croatia in its negotiations to join the European Union. This is not like the Irish protocol. It is not a post-factual situation—it has to apply from now on—and it is part of the accession treaty that we are discussing. We cannot just alter it and expect something to happen in future that would help us. I totally disagree with the hon. Gentleman.

I would welcome clarification of this matter, given that Opposition Front Benchers do not have a whole army of Foreign Office civil servants to help us—

Ian C. Lucas Portrait Ian Lucas (Wrexham) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

You’ve got me.

Emma Reynolds Portrait Emma Reynolds
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have my hon. Friends, obviously, whose help and advice are always most welcome.

I look forward to the Minister’s response, but I am pretty confident that my interpretation is correct, and we therefore do not support the amendment.