All 1 Debates between James Murray and Sarah Pochin

Pathways Study: Puberty Suppression

Debate between James Murray and Sarah Pochin
Monday 22nd June 2026

(1 month, 1 week ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
James Murray Portrait James Murray
- View Speech - Hansard - -

As a result of the work that the MHRA has been doing with these trial sponsors in recent months, there are now objective set criteria against which children and young people involved in the trial would be automatically withdrawn. Those criteria, as I set out earlier, will stop the short-term harm, and the view of the National Institute for Health and Care Research is that this means any long-term harm should not occur or go unnoticed. It is important that we ensure that the appropriate safeguards are in place for this trial. That is why I welcome what the MHRA has done in recent months, because it strengthens those safeguards, which are important in any clinical trial but, in this trial, could not be more important.

Sarah Pochin Portrait Sarah Pochin (Runcorn and Helsby) (Reform)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Secretary of State has said that no child subject to safeguarding concerns will be considered for participation in the trial. Can he confirm, therefore, that no already vulnerable children currently in the care system will be accepted on to the trial?