Employers Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: HM Treasury

Employers

Jayne Kirkham Excerpts
Wednesday 11th November 2026

(1 day, 13 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Jayne Kirkham Portrait Jayne Kirkham (Truro and Falmouth) (Lab/Co-op)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I want to speak in the debate because Cornwall probably has more self-employed and small businesses than many other places. Small businesspeople hold businesses together and employ people. They take on the responsibility, risk and privilege of creating jobs for other people. I considered myself as much of a working person when I was an equity partner in a law firm that employed 50 people as I did when I was a teaching assistant.

Small businesses do an incredibly important job. I want to talk about a few of them in my constituency. Richard Wakeham at Treveague campsite in Gorran employs six people. We also have Mariners and Harbour Lights, our brilliant fish and chip shops; Bread & Butter in Truro; Fudge & More in St Mawes; and Windjammer, with Oliver running a number of establishments brilliantly. Of course, we have our farmers—I went to see one in Restronguet at the weekend—and then we have publicans like Mark Holden, who runs a number of pubs and has built his hospitality business over 16 years. For many years, Mark has worked hard with young people, setting up apprenticeships and giving training to dozens of Cornish young people. He is working closely with the Government and the Minister for Skills to set up skills training in hospitality down in Cornwall.

The motion concentrates on under-25s, so that is what I will focus on. Our young people have struggled, with rising numbers of NEETs, but that has been over a long time, not just the last two years, as the Milburn review made clear. Alan Milburn said that this has been a growing issue, and among the reasons for that are: how SEND provision in schools dropped off under the previous Government; covid, which was a really big issue for young people and hit their confidence; and mental health support, with child and adolescent mental health services having been decimated in the last 15 years.

As has been pointed out a number of times, employers pay no national insurance contributions on earnings of up to £50,270 for under-21s, nor for apprentices under 25. That makes a saving of up to £6,790 per employee per year, which was worth £2.5 billion in the last year.

Some of the Opposition Members have talked about the minimum wage rises. When the Labour Government first brought in the minimum wage, the figure was similar for everybody over 18, and businesses did not shut down and the economy did not stop, as the Opposition said would happen. When they got into power, they split the minimum wage into three or four different age brackets. That caused an awful lot of problems and inequity, because a 20-year-old’s rent is not cheaper than a 26-year-old’s. In trying to converge those wage differences, we are trying to reintroduce that fairness and the idea of the minimum wage in the first place.

This Government have introduced other measures to help small and medium-sized employers take on young people: £2,000 for SMEs that hire apprentices between 16 and 21; free training for under-25 apprentices; the youth jobs grant, with £3,000 for every young person hired; and the jobs guarantee, which is coming in, for fully subsidised jobs for six months, with the Government covering 100% of the employment costs. There are a thousand people in that first pilot.

There is a lot of work to be done. Under-25s have struggled for many reasons over a number of years, not just because of the job market. What we have to do, and what the Milburn review will make very clear in the next few weeks that we should do, is support those young people to overcome their barriers and help employers to employ them again.

--- Later in debate ---
Jayne Kirkham Portrait Jayne Kirkham
- Hansard - -

rose—

Rebecca Smith Portrait Rebecca Smith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will continue.

It is little wonder that job opportunities have shrivelled up under Labour, as has been pointed out by Members on the Government Benches. Vacancies fell by 21,000 between July and September this year, and as we have heard, small firms are being hit the hardest. To get our economy moving again, the Conservatives would halve employer national insurance contributions for under-25s. We would help young people get a foot on the ladder by backing the businesses that are prepared to give them that first opportunity.

Madam Deputy Speaker, you might be pleased to hear that there are more than 3,700 small and medium-sized enterprises in South West Devon, much like in Cornwall, which has been mentioned already. The south-west is home to many SMEs. Each one represents somebody who took a risk, invested their savings, employed local people and worked many long hours to build something of their own. In fact, that was my own experience. My dad regularly went out to work before I had even had breakfast, then came home and fell asleep—I never got a story or anything like that. He was out working six days a week, running his small business. When he was asleep, he was worrying about how the business was going to survive.

For many sole traders and small business owners, there is no guaranteed safety net if their business fails. If they have no public sector pension waiting for them at retirement, they are in an even more precarious position. I was therefore genuinely astounded when a Labour Minister had the audacity to claim that employers are not working people. The employers I know work incredibly hard. They are, as we have heard many times today, the ones opening up before dawn and locking up long after everyone else has gone home. They are the ones managing staff, cash flow and contracts. They bear the ultimate responsibility when things go wrong. When a business goes under, the employees may be able to move on to another job—although given the examples this afternoon, that is perhaps less of a possibility—but for many business owners, it is not that simple. They are losing something they have devoted years of hard work to building.

The Labour Government seem to forget that 99% of businesses in the UK are small and medium-sized enterprises, meaning that they have fewer than 250 employees. Saddled with ever higher costs, these businesses are now faced with difficult choices to raise prices, cut trading hours or make redundancies. Indeed, one local café owner told me that they have been forced to cut back deliberately on younger staff to protect the jobs of their employees who have mortgages and rent to pay. Added to that, they breed poultry, and they have had to increase the mid-year price of chickens, which will go on and lay eggs for people, for the first time in 18 years, which is driven by rising prices of animal feed, gas and fuel.

One local electrician from Plympton has told me how he regularly sees about 10 other businesses at the wholesaler each morning. There was a time when the majority of them had an apprentice, but now it is just him, and he has one only because it is his son, so it is in his interest to keep the business going. Ministers seem to have forgotten that employers pay the apprentice when they are at college as well as when they are at work, and the costs are just too high.

I have 670 construction businesses in my constituency, and one of them used to participate in an innovative scheme to support recovering addicts back into work. It partnered with well-loved Shekinah, a Plymouth homelessness charity, which provides employment support for people undergoing treatment for drug or alcohol misuse. These people would work for the company on a flexible basis, starting at a few days per week and building up gradually. After a few months, the workers would go on to gain full-time employment with other businesses. However, the company’s founders, Aaron and Sarah, say that it is impossible to continue offering this scheme due to the increased labour costs. As Aaron has said:

“We are so sad about this, as it is something that we feel is vital. Everyone needs a second chance and the chance for work and purpose in life.”

I believe that that is a sad indictment of Labour’s damaging policies.

The couple have also made the difficult decision to stop taking on apprentices. The business simply cannot afford it, despite being regularly approached by local colleges. Aaron told me that the total employment cost per day for a 21-year-old with no experience is now over £100, but for twice the cost he could recruit and employ an experienced tradesperson, who would be three or four times more productive from day one and require no supervision.

Despite the changes at the top table, this is the same old Labour, with more taxes and higher costs. If the Government are serious about helping people off welfare, they should stop making it harder to hire them. Labour’s answer is to punish employers. Ours is to create more opportunities and more apprenticeships, and get more people into work.