Savings (Government Contributions) Bill (Second sitting) Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: HM Treasury

Savings (Government Contributions) Bill (Second sitting)

Jeremy Quin Excerpts
Tuesday 25th October 2016

(7 years, 6 months ago)

Public Bill Committees
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Jeremy Quin Portrait Jeremy Quin (Horsham) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Q You mentioned earlier, Mr Davies, that we had to respect the decisions made by people. I am totally with you that pensions are the right way for most people to save for their retirement. You have spoken eloquently about the problems and difficulties faced by the people who most need to save but find it most difficult to do so. Do you really want to deprive them of that ability to get £5 from £4 for another year?

Bryn Davies: No, no. I am not saying that this should not be included in the Bill. I do think probably that it is a bit tokenistic and that stronger measures to deal with poverty and crises caused by poverty within the social security system would be a more effective way of using the money, but I am not saying don’t do it.

Jeremy Quin Portrait Jeremy Quin
- Hansard - -

You would not stand against the principle of doing this, but you would like to do more things— I hear that.

Jane Ellison Portrait Jane Ellison (Battersea) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Q I have just a brief comment. Does Mr Davies have any modelling or research that he has done to support his concerns around the interaction of these products and auto-enrolment? It would be useful if we could have that.

Bryn Davies: The short answer is that I do not and would not pretend that I did. If I were the only person saying this, I would be worried, but there is a broad swathe of opinion, not least including at least one Member in your own party, expressing these fears, so I do think they need to be taken seriously.