All 1 Jim Cunningham contributions to the Health Service Medical Supplies (Costs) Act 2017

Read Bill Ministerial Extracts

Tue 6th Dec 2016
Health Service Medical Supplies (Costs) Bill
Commons Chamber

3rd reading: House of Commons & Report stage: House of Commons

Health Service Medical Supplies (Costs) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department of Health and Social Care

Health Service Medical Supplies (Costs) Bill

Jim Cunningham Excerpts
3rd reading: House of Commons & Report stage: House of Commons
Tuesday 6th December 2016

(7 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Health Service Medical Supplies (Costs) Act 2017 Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: Consideration of Bill Amendments as at 6 December 2016 - (6 Dec 2016)
That is the same wording, this time applying to Wales, as in section 260(5) of the NHS Act 2006, which applies to England. Amendment 7 amends the Welsh legislation, very understandably, to clarify the definition of medical supplies. In Committee the Government did not see the need to clarify the definition of medical supplies as it applies to England, but today are seeking to clarify the same definition of medical supplies as it applies to Wales. I am therefore bemused.
Jim Cunningham Portrait Mr Jim Cunningham (Coventry South) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend’s analysis of medical supplies is very interesting. I would have thought that pharmaceuticals, for example, would be classified as medical supplies, given that they have always been a contentious area of negotiations over costs. I am surprised that they are not included in the definition.

Rob Marris Portrait Rob Marris
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Medical supplies in this part of the Bill seem to be to do with physical equipment. But, again, what is equipment? We can refer to the definitions, which state:

‘medical supplies’ includes surgical, dental and optical materials and equipment”.

Drugs are dealt with elsewhere in the legislation.

I think the Minister has got the point, but I will repeat it very briefly. He is seeking clarification for the Wales legislation through amendment 7 when I understood him to say that he did not think such clarification was needed for the same definition contained in the legislation pertaining to England. I would like him to explain that apparent anomaly. If it is not an anomaly, perhaps he could tell the House that he is going to clarify the definition as it relates to England in the later stages of this Bill.