Solar Power (Feed-in Tariff) Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Solar Power (Feed-in Tariff)

Joan Ruddock Excerpts
Wednesday 23rd November 2011

(12 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Chris Huhne Portrait Chris Huhne
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will give way to the right hon. Member for Lewisham, Deptford (Joan Ruddock), who is a former Minister in this area and whose expertise is well known.

Joan Ruddock Portrait Joan Ruddock (Lewisham, Deptford) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

May I reiterate what was said by my right hon. Friend the Member for Don Valley (Caroline Flint), who speaks from our Front Bench? It is not about the fact the tariffs are being reduced but the way in which it is being done. Peabody housing association, which works in my constituency, was going to have installed 6 MW of provision by March of next year and the programme has been decimated. The Minister of State has said that it can get ahead with a 5% return but it was planning—and had received—a 7.5% return and its borrowing costs are 5.3%. It cannot be done. The Secretary of State must change his mind.

Chris Huhne Portrait Chris Huhne
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I listen to what the right hon. Lady says, but the reality is that the scheme takes us back to the rate of return when the scheme was introduced by the previous Government in April 2010. It was appropriate then and all we are doing is taking account of what has happened in the real world, where there has been a very dramatic reduction in the cost. I have yet to meet a single manager of a single scheme who has persuaded me that they will lose money by proceeding with their scheme. They might make less money than they previously planned—that occasionally arises—but the business of my Department is not to provide extra rate support grants to local councils but to ensure that we have a successful renewable energy scheme and that we get solar panels out there. It is not a back-door way of funding extra support.